1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Excitons in nanocrystals: Ab initio calculations
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2913314
/content/aip/journal/jap/103/10/10.1063/1.2913314
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/103/10/10.1063/1.2913314

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Nanocrystal atomic configuration for different molar fractions. The atomic species H, Si, and Ge are represented in white, yellow, and green, respectively. Their respective LUMO and HOMO orbitals integrated in the coordinate are also shown.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Average bond lengths (in angstroms) for different molar fractions of a NC 1.4 nm in diameter.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Molar fraction dependence of the quasiparticle (, solid diamonds) and HOMO-LUMO (, solid circles) gaps and the self-energy interation (, solid squares). For the sake of comparison, the LDA results of Melnikov et al. are displayed with open symbols (Ref. 19). The GW-corrected HOMO-LUMO gaps of Yu et al. are represented by crosses (Ref. 39).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Molar fraction -dependence of the exciton energy for NCs 1.4 nm in diameter with (solid circles) and without (solid squares) the contribution of . For comparison, we also display PEM energies (open and solid stars, Ref. 38), the scaled PL data of Takeoka et al. (solid diamonds, Refs. 6 and 17), and the GW-corrected HOMO-LUMO gaps of Yu et al. (crosses, Ref. 39).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Molar fraction dependence of the exciton binding energy of the NCs 1.4 nm in diameter. The inset shows the exciton exchange energy (solid diamonds), as compared with those by Weissker et al. (open diamonds, Ref. 24) and Reboredo et al. (cross diamonds, Ref. 29). (b) Molar fraction dependence of the wave function dispersion of the LUMO (solid circles) and HOMO (open circles) orbitals.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The molar fraction -dependence of the radiative recombination lifetime of NCs 1.4 nm in diameter (solid squares). All values are normalized with respect to the case where . For comparison, we also display the normalized radiative lifetimes of Takeoka et al.(Ref. 17, solid diamonds), Weissker et al. (Ref. 38, open and solid stars), and Yu et al. (crosses, Ref. 39).

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Detailed atomic compositions and bond structures for all molar fractions cases investigated in this work. The NC diameter is approximately equal to 1.4 nm.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/103/10/10.1063/1.2913314
2008-05-28
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Excitons in Si1−xGex nanocrystals: Ab initio calculations
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/103/10/10.1063/1.2913314
10.1063/1.2913314
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM