1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Spin-polarized electron transport in fractal semiconductor multilayers with two ferromagnetic contacts
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2952541
/content/aip/journal/jap/104/2/10.1063/1.2952541
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/104/2/10.1063/1.2952541
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) Fractal semiconductor multilayers and (b) periodic semiconductor multilayers for stages , 1, 2, 3, and 4. Gray and white regions represent layers and , respectively. (c) An F/SM/F structure showing layer number and interface coordinates as used in the calculation procedure described below.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Transmission coefficients vs the length, , of the semiconductor multilayers for the F/PSM/F heterostructures for at growth stages (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), respectively. The solid, short dashed, and dotted lines correspond to , , and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Transmission coefficients vs the length, , of the semiconductor multilayers for the F/FSM/F heterostructures for at growth stages (a), (b), and (c), respectively. The solid, short dashed, and dotted lines correspond to , , and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Transmission coefficients against the strength of the spin-orbit coupling for the F/PSM/F heterostructures for at growth stages (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), respectively. The solid, short dashed, and dotted lines correspond to , , and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Transmission coefficients against the strength of the spin-orbit coupling for the F/FSM/F heterostructures for at growth stages (a), (b), and (c), respectively. The solid, short dashed, and dotted lines correspond to , , and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Correlation coefficients of the transmission coefficients shown in Figs. 3(c) and 2(e) for the three cases (a) , (b) , and (c) . The solid and short dashed lines correspond to the F/FSM/F and F/PSM/F heterostructures, respectively.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Correlation coefficients of the transmission coefficients shown in Figs. 5(c) and 4(e) for the three cases (a) , (b) , and (c) . The solid and short dashed lines correspond to the F/FSM/F and F/PSM/F heterostructures, respectively.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Transmission coefficients for (a) , (b) , (c) , and (d) vs the strength of the spin-orbit coupling for the F/PSM/F heterostructures of stage with four degrees of randomness in the layer thicknesses.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Transmission coefficients for (a) , (b) , (c) , and (d) vs the strength of the spin-orbit coupling for the F/FSM/F heterostructures of stage with four degrees of randomness in the layer thicknesses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/104/2/10.1063/1.2952541
2008-07-22
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Spin-polarized electron transport in fractal semiconductor multilayers with two ferromagnetic contacts
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/104/2/10.1063/1.2952541
10.1063/1.2952541
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM