1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Experiments and numerical simulations on high-density magnetohydrodynamic electrical power generation
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2978190
/content/aip/journal/jap/104/6/10.1063/1.2978190
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/104/6/10.1063/1.2978190

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of shock-tube facility.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Schematic illustration of the MHD generator.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Schematics of the MHD generator. Front view (upper) and cross-sectional view (lower).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Typical image of MHD power generation plasma.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Typical time variations of (a) total inflow temperature , (b) total pressure at the inlet and exit obtained with and without magnetic flux (indicated by and , respectively), (c) exit Mach number , (d) Hall current , and (e) electron temperature measured at the radius of .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Calculation region of quasi-three-dimensional numerical simulation.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Effect of the inlet boundary conditions on the power generation performance. (a) IE and EER as a function of electron temperature under the fixed gas temperature condition. (b) IE and EER as a function of under the fixed condition.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

(a) Cross-sectional view of the generator, the radial profiles of (b) static pressure , (c) Hall potential , (d) electron temperature and static temperature , (e) Mach number (M), (f) Hall parameter and modified electrical conductivity , (g) electrical efficiency and loading parameter , and (h) normalized fraction of the enthalpy extraction factor (power output PW) and the entropy production factors (Joule heating JH and wall friction loss WL). Experimental results are indicated by closed [(●) ] and open circles [(○) ]. Numerical results are indicated by solid [(–) ] and dashed curves [(---) ]. The total inflow pressure is . The seed fraction is . The loading condition is . The magnetic flux density is .

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Image of the discharge structure of the MHD power generation plasma and the two-dimensional distributions of the electron number density and the RD velocity under (a) weak MHD interaction and (b) strong MHD interaction. The seed fractions are (a) and (b) . The total inflow pressure is . The loading condition is . The magnetic flux density is .

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Numerical result of enthalpy -entropy diagram calculated in the MHD channel for the cases of (a) weak MHD interaction and (b) strong MHD interaction. Calculating condition is the same as that in Fig. 9.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

(a)IE as a function of seed fraction (SF). (b) Hall voltage -Hall current characteristics. The experimental conditions are the load resistance of , the seed fraction of , and the magnetic flux density of . The numerical conditions are the load resistance of , the seed fraction of , and the magnetic flux density of .

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Numerical prediction of the relationship between the plasma-fluid properties and the generator performance. IE as functions of (a) Hall parameter , (b) modified electrical conductivity , (c) Mach number , and (d) electrical efficiency . The calculating conditions are the total inflow pressure of , and the magnetic flux density of . For a fixed magnetic flux density, the loading condition is optimized to achieve the best performance by varying the seed fraction and load resistance.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Experimental and numerical results of IE and EER. The experimental and numerical results are indicated by closed circles and solid curves, respectively. Experimental conditions are the total inflow pressure of and the magnetic flux density of . Numerical conditions are the total inflow pressure of and the magnetic flux density of . For a fixed combination of the total inflow pressure and magnetic flux density, the loading condition is optimized to achieve the best performance by varying the seed fraction and load resistance.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Comparison of the power-generating performance between the present and previous experiments. (a) IE and EER as a function of , which we refer to as the modified magnetic flux density, defined as the square of the applied magnetic flux density at the MHD channel center divided by the total inflow pressure. (b) The ratio of IE to EER (IE/EER) as a function of the MHD channel divergence (cross-sectional-area ratio, AR). (c) The power output density (PD) as a function of . The present data and previous data for larger-scale RD and SW generators using Ar–Cs are shown.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Geometry of generator and operating conditions.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Conditions used in calculations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/104/6/10.1063/1.2978190
2008-09-24
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Experiments and numerical simulations on high-density magnetohydrodynamic electrical power generation
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/104/6/10.1063/1.2978190
10.1063/1.2978190
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM