banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Ionoluminescent response of several phosphor screens to keV ions of different masses
Rent this article for


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

A schematic diagram of the experimental setup showing the different elements used to excite luminescence of the sample, either ions (blue, from left side) or UV light (green, right side). The luminescence is measured by a very sensitive system composed of a scan filter monochromator (400–700 nm), and a photomultiplier.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Photography of the facility to measure IL at the CIEMAT laboratory.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The transmission properties of the low resolution spectral system are shown by the variation in the instrumental width (FWHM, left axis) and in the relative transmission (right axis).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The time evolution of the raw ionoluminescent signal during several seconds of irradiation of the phosphor screen. Several steps in the ion beam energy are seen. When the bias is set to zero between the different biasing values, the signal recovers the background value: (a) P45, (b) P46, (c) P47, (d) P47 (expanded view) (e) P56, and (f) TG-green.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

A selection of plots corresponding to ionoluminescent spectra, in the range covered by the spectrometer, obtained at discrete energies of the ion beam (Ar) for representative phosphors: (a) P45, (b) P46, and (c) P56.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Influence of the ion beam current for three discrete energies of the ion beam (15, 25, and 33 keV) on (a) P45, (b) P47, and (c) YAG:Ce crystal. A clear saturation of the response is evident for current values above 35–40 mA.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Plot of the actual current measured at sample position vs the nominal current of the ion source provided by its own control system.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

The IL response as a function of the proton beam energy for all the phosphor screens studied. A slight saturation effect is seen at the highest energy values, which is more pronounced for the case of the P47 screen.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Absolute IL response of P45 as a function of incident ion beam energy for three different ions (continuous lines) and theoretical estimates of the same, using a first approximation based on the SRIM code (dotted lines). Good correlation is seen for all ions at low energies .

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Comparative response of (a) a powdered screen made of P45 phosphor and (b) a crystal scintillator YAG:Ce. The results correspond to luminescence data obtained with and ions and plotted in the same relative scale to highlight the excellent response of the phosphor screen compared with the scintillator in this low energy range.


Generic image for table
Table I.

Dependence of maximum transmission and FWHM of the filter monochromator as a function of wavelength.

Generic image for table
Table II.

List of materials prepared in-house (except TG-green) for IL measurements together with their most important properties.

Generic image for table
Table III.

A comparison of IL light production by irradiation (in absolute values) with normalized values for CL and PL for the materials under study. In the case of P45 its relative CL efficiency is high compared to the other materials. However, its relative IL efficiency is low. On the other hand, the relative response of P47 is higher for IL.

Generic image for table
Table IV.

Estimated stopping ranges of accelerated argon, hydrogen and helium ions with 35 keV in the phosphors under study. For this, 10000 ions were used in the simulations.28


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Ionoluminescent response of several phosphor screens to keV ions of different masses