1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Stress generated modifications of epitaxial ferroelectric films on sapphire
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3139292
/content/aip/journal/jap/105/11/10.1063/1.3139292
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/105/11/10.1063/1.3139292
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Shift in the ferroelectric transition temperature of (001)-oriented STO as function of the in-plane lattice mismatch between substrate (or buffer) and STO layers. (Refs. 8 and 9) The structural mismatch was measured at room temperature, and the ferroelectricity was determined for electric field parallel to the film surface. Theoretical predictions are added. (Ref. 11)

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Thickness dependence of the out-of-plane lattice parameter of STO (circles) and (, squares), and FWHM (triangles) of the (200) rocking curve of the STO layer, respectively. The dashed lines indicate the literature values of the lattice parameters for STO and .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Microscope images (area: ) of the surface of STO films of thickness (a), 525 nm (b), 740 nm (c), and 970 nm (d). The crystallographic orientations of the substrate, buffer, and STO layer are determined via XRD diffraction experiments, they are identical for all images and are indicated in [(c) and (d)].The dashed ellipses in (b) mark hardly visible cracks in the STO film of medium thickness.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) XRD pole figures [(001) STO, (001) , and (012) ] provide the in-plane crystallographic orientation of the different layers with respect to the orientation of the substrate; (b) 2D-plot of the dependence of characteristic diffraction peaks of the pole figures [(112) and of STO, of , and of ] obtained for the samples of different STO layer thicknesses. The characteristic shift in the STO diffraction peak with respect to the diffraction peak is shown in detail for a thick film (c) and a thin film (d). For a better comparison, the (112) STO peaks are shifted by 45° in [(c) and (d)].

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Critical thicknesses for the generation of misfit dislocations according to van der Merwe (Ref. 18) (dotted black line) and Matthews theory [solid line, Eq. (3)], and critical thickness for crack generation according to Eq. (6) for different values of and . The vertical lines indicate the lattice misfit of STO with respect to various substrates.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/105/11/10.1063/1.3139292
2009-06-08
2014-04-21
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Stress generated modifications of epitaxial ferroelectric SrTiO3 films on sapphire
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/105/11/10.1063/1.3139292
10.1063/1.3139292
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM