1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Real-time microstructure of shocked LiF crystals: Use of synchrotron x-rays
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3080176
/content/aip/journal/jap/105/5/10.1063/1.3080176
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/105/5/10.1063/1.3080176

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic illustration of shock wave profiles propagating from left to right in LiF single crystals. For LiF shocked along [111], a single elastic wave propagates. For LiF shocked along [100], a two-wave structure propagates consisting of an elastic wave and a slower traveling plastic wave. The Mg-doped LiF and the pure LiF shocked along [100] exhibit large and small amplitude elastic waves, respectively.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Sketch of the experimental arrangement. The ambient LiF crystal is oriented with a particular reciprocal lattice vector, , nominally parallel to the impact direction (-axis). is the scattering angle. The distance from the effective x-ray source to the sample (400 mm) is equal to the distance from the sample to the area detector. The face of the detector is perpendicular to the diffracted beam.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Picture of the experimental setup in hutch 16ID-D of HPCAT at the Advanced Photon Source.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Representative diffraction images for which the real space coordinates have been mapped linearly into reciprocal space. (a) and (b) show images from Expt. 1 of the 111 peak from unshocked and shocked LiF(111), respectively. (c) and (d) show images from Expt. 5 of the 200 peak from unshocked and shocked Mg-doped LiF(100), respectively. (e) and (f) show diffraction patterns, using two different sets of microstructural parameters, to simulate the experimental data shown in (d). All intensity scales have arbitrary units.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Binned cross sections of the measured [Figs. 4(c) and 4(d)] and simulated [Figs. 4(e) and 4(f)] diffraction patterns for Expt. 5. (a) shows binned vertical cross sections and (b) shows binned horizontal cross sections.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Measured lattice compression (on average) along the shock propagation direction and the corresponding calculated density compression are plotted. As described in Ref. 3, the dashed and solid lines are the expected relationships between the lattice and density compressions for uniaxial and isotropic lattice compressions, respectively.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(a) Shock-induced (100) microlattice-plane rotational spread (FWHM), , in LiF. The dashed lines represent linear fits to the data constrained to pass through the origin. (b) FWHM of diffraction peak, , in reciprocal space. The peak widths under ambient conditions are shown at zero stress and are caused primarily by instrumental broadening. Elastic compression along [111] is shown as a reference.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Experimental parameters.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Experimental results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/105/5/10.1063/1.3080176
2009-03-12
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Real-time microstructure of shocked LiF crystals: Use of synchrotron x-rays
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/105/5/10.1063/1.3080176
10.1063/1.3080176
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM