1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The effect of Ni doping on the magnetic and transport properties in manganites
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3168422
/content/aip/journal/jap/106/1/10.1063/1.3168422
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/106/1/10.1063/1.3168422

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Illustration of fit of XRD pattern for samples (a) and (b) .

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

The variation of lattice parameters with Ni additions (a) of all stoichiometric samples and (b) nonstoichiometric specimens.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The high resistances (by approximately four to five orders) of specimens 2 and 4 with and 0.07Ni, respectively, represent specimens sintered and annealed in Ar showing extremely high resistance, compared to specimens 3 and 5 with the same Ni content but annealed in O.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Resistance with and without field and MR of various samples. (a) Resistance with and without Ni doping; note the high resistance of the undoped sample. (b) Resistance of specimen 8; note the transition to the FM condition. (c) Comparison of MR of various Ni-doped specimens; only specimen 8 shows a transition to FM condition.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The derivative of resistivity with temperature vs for undoped specimen. CO transition is indicated at with and without field. The activation energy is .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Magnetization of (a) measured in magnetic field and (b) measured at 230 K vs .

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Magnetization of (a) measured in magnetic field 100 Oe and (b) measured at 10 K vs .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Magnetization of (a) vs at 100 Oe, (b) vs magnetic field at different temperatures, and (c) vs magnetic field at ambient and 10.6 kbar pressure at 10 K.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

XRD of samples 3 and 8. No shift of peaks can be detected. Based on the XRD analysis, it was assumed that in both cases the O content is about the same at an average level of 2.975 (the chemical analysis of sample 8). The peak shift of to the right occurred in O treated samples.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Temperature dependences of EMR spectra: (a) undoped sample , . (b) Ni-doped sample , .

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Temperature dependences of EMR spectra for two samples with the same Ni-doping level : low temperature region, (a) sample 3, and (c) sample 8, ; high temperature region, (b) sample 3, , dotted ellipses mark the additional low-field EMR signals, and (d) sample 8, .

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Temperature dependences of doubly integrated EMR spectra intensities: blue open triangles—sample , black open stars—sample , and red circles—sample . All intensities are normalized to the intensity value taken at (PM region). The lines are guides for eyes.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Temperature dependences of EMR spectra parameters: (a) line widths and (b) resonance field (manganitelike line only). Blue open triangles—sample , black open stars—sample , and red circles—sample . The lines are guides for eyes.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Lattice parameters for various specimens.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Activation energies for conduction at and .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/106/1/10.1063/1.3168422
2009-07-15
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: The effect of Ni doping on the magnetic and transport properties in Pr0.5Ca0.5Mn1−xNixO3 manganites
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/106/1/10.1063/1.3168422
10.1063/1.3168422
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM