1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Slow light at terahertz frequencies in surface plasmon polariton assisted grating waveguide
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3260236
/content/aip/journal/jap/106/10/10.1063/1.3260236
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/106/10/10.1063/1.3260236
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) Grating structure (1D array of grooves: the width and the depth separated by a distance ) for comparison. (b) GW structure with a tapered input port. [(c)–(e)] Three different GGWs for light trapping: (c) depth-varying structure, (d) gap-varying structure, and (e) both-varying structure (gap and depth both vary).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Band structures in the GW with , , , and . As shown above, the axis is the propagation constant in a unit of .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) E field intensity distribution of the -like plasmon mode in the GW with , , , and . (b) Transverse E field intensity distributions of the -like plasmon modes for three different depths , 50, and . [(c) and (d)] Snapshots of the phase of the magnetic field (Hy): -like plasmon mode in the GW with gap (c), and -like oscillating mode in the GW with gap (d).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Dispersion curves of the spoof SPPs for , , and and different gaps , 40, 60, and . Inset: cutoff frequency vs gap. (b) Dispersion curves of the spoof SPPs for , , and and different depths , 40, 50, and . Inset: cutoff frequency vs depth.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Transfer efficiency vs gap at 1 THz for , , and . (b) Transfer efficiency vs depth at 1 THz for , , and . (c) Transfer efficiency vs wavelength for , , , and .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

(a) E field intensity distribution in the GW with , , , and at 1.2 THz after the propagation time of (c is the light velocity in vacuum). The scale of the intensity is indicated by logarithmic scale color bar. (b) The distributions of E intensity at a plane in the center of the GW after three different propagation times of 5000, , and (50 ps).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

E field intensity distributions in three different GGWs at 1 THz after the propagation time of 25 ps for (a) the gap-varying structure with and decreasing from 80 to , (b) the depth-varying structure with and increasing from 17 to , and (c) the both-varying structure with decreasing from 80 to and increasing from 17 to , over along the x direction. Insets: schematic structures of the GGWs. The scale of the intensity is indicated by the logarithmic scale color bar.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

The distributions of E intensity at a plane in the center of the both-varying GGW (dashed line in the insets) for (a) different propagation times of 25 and 50 ps, and (b) different excitation frequencies of 1, 1.5, and 2 THz.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/106/10/10.1063/1.3260236
2009-11-24
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Slow light at terahertz frequencies in surface plasmon polariton assisted grating waveguide
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/106/10/10.1063/1.3260236
10.1063/1.3260236
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM