1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Structural and room-temperature ferromagnetic properties of Fe-doped CuO nanocrystals
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3436573
/content/aip/journal/jap/107/11/10.1063/1.3436573
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/107/11/10.1063/1.3436573

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

XRD patterns of the (, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3) NC samples. The vertical lines at the bottom are the standard JCPDS data of monoclinic CuO (card No.89–5898). The arrows ↓ denotes the peaks of the miscellaneous phase .

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Representative XRD refinement patterns for (, 0.1, and 0.2) samples. The circle signs (○) are the experimental XRD data and the solid lines almost at the same position of each value are the calculated profile, below which is the difference between experimental and calculated data. The vertical lines at the bottom indicate the diffraction angles of allowed Bragg reflections.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The results obtained from XRD refinement of (, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2) samples. (a) The actual Fe concentration and (b) the vacancy concentration.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

XPS spectra of (a) and (b) for . The circle signs (○) and the solid plots are the experimental data and the simulated data/peaks, respectively, while the dashed lines are the background.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Typical (a) TEM and (b) HRTEM images of . The inset in (b) is the corresponding ED pattern.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The magnetization of ferromagnetic part of the samples (, 0.02, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20) as a function of applied magnetic field, (a) at 300 K and (b) at 60 K. The insets are the zoomed in hysteresis around zero applied magnetic field.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Temperature dependence of magnetization for the (, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) samples taken at applied magnetic field of 200 Oe.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Magnetic hysteresis loops of the sample at , 30, 50, 55, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 K. The inset is the magnetization of the ferromagnetic part of the sample as a function of applied magnetic field.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Temperature dependence of , , and for the sample.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility , , and the difference susceptibility of sample. The inset shows the magnified curve for the ZFC data.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Experimental (triangle signs “▲”) and simulated (circle signs ○) saturation magnetization as a function of Fe doping concentration (neglecting the contribution from the vacancies) in the samples.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

XRD refinement results of samples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/107/11/10.1063/1.3436573
2010-06-03
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Structural and room-temperature ferromagnetic properties of Fe-doped CuO nanocrystals
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/107/11/10.1063/1.3436573
10.1063/1.3436573
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM