1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Superconducting spintronics: Spin-polarized transport in superconducting junctions with ferromagnetic semiconducting contact
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3318287
/content/aip/journal/jap/107/4/10.1063/1.3318287
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/107/4/10.1063/1.3318287
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

vs diagrams sketching the (a) FM/SC, (b) FS/SC, and (c) SC/SC systems in the absence of bias voltages (from Ref. 22).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Spatial variation in superconducting order parameter in FS and SC. Here, and with , , , , (a) for the heavy hole and (b) for the light holes (from Ref. 22).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Spatial variation in electron DOS in the FS and SC with the same parameters as in Fig. 2. for the (a) heavy and (b) light holes (from Ref. 22).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The same dependence in SC as in Fig. 2 (from Ref. 22).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Schematic illustration of reflections and transmissions of quasiparticles in an FS/SC/FS double junction (from Ref. 27).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Scattering probabilities , , , and (with and ) for an FS/SC/FS double junction as a function of at different in the P (the left column) and AP (the right column) alignments. Here , , , , and for the heavy hole (from Ref. 27).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

TMR for an FS/SC/FS double junction as a function of for different , 0.05, 0.15, and all the parameters are the same as in Fig. 6 (from Ref. 27).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

The variation in for the heavy holes with bias voltage in the AP alignment at , 0.3, and 0.4 in order from upper to lower. Here , 0.9, (solid lines), (dotted lines), , , , , and for the heavy holes (from Ref. 24).

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Differential conductance as a function of bias voltage for the heavy holes with in the (a) P and (b) AP alignments as well as for the light holes with in the (c) P, and (d) AP alignments. Here, , , , , , , 0.05, and 0.15 (from Ref. 24).

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

TMR as a function of (a) and (b) . Here , 10.0, , for the heavy holes and for the light in (a), and the other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 9 (from Ref. 24).

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Josephson current-phase relation for at different . Here, , , 10, and 15, , , and (a) for the heavy hole and ,; (b) for the light holes, and (from Ref. 23).

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

The same dependence as in Fig. 11 at different : (a) for the heavy hole, , 0.005, and 0.01; (b) for the light holes, , 0.05, and 0.1. Here, the other parameters are and (from Ref. 23).

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

The same dependence as in Fig. 11 with at different . Here, the parameters are and : (a) for the heavy hole, , 0.8, and 0.85; (b) for the light holes, , 0.15, and 0.2 (from Ref. 23).

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

The phases of the Josephson current for the heavy holes at different in the P and AP alignments. Here, , , , , , and are given in the inset (from Refs. 25 and 26).

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

The same dependence for the light holes as in Fig. 14 (from Refs. 25 and 26).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/107/4/10.1063/1.3318287
2010-02-25
2014-04-21
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Superconducting spintronics: Spin-polarized transport in superconducting junctions with ferromagnetic semiconducting contact
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/107/4/10.1063/1.3318287
10.1063/1.3318287
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM