1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Two sources of cross-field error in racetrack fluxgate
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3337721
/content/aip/journal/jap/107/9/10.1063/1.3337721
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/107/9/10.1063/1.3337721
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

PCB fluxgate sensor—depicting the geometric aspects: angular difference between core and coil axis and longitudinal shift . The upright sections of the core are clearly visible as not covered by the pick-up/compensating coil.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Measurement setup used for determining the cross-field response. Sensor (not to scale) shown having the main-field Bm in sensitive direction and the cross-field Bc in perpendicular direction.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Cross-field response (perpendicular direction to the sensor core) shown for five different fields in main direction, offset due to main field removed.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Cross-field response (perpendicular direction to the pick-up coil) shown for three different fields in main direction, and also for modified detection electronics (thin trace).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The same data as in Fig. 3 , but expressed as sensitivity change on applied cross-field.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/107/9/10.1063/1.3337721
2010-04-30
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Two sources of cross-field error in racetrack fluxgate
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/107/9/10.1063/1.3337721
10.1063/1.3337721
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM