(Color online) (a) I/V-LEED curves of 10 and 2 ML Mn/10 ML Co/Cu(100), 10 ML Co/Cu(100), and Cu(100). (b) The deduced interlayer distances of the various samples. LEED patterns of (c) 10 ML Mn/10 ML Co/Cu(100) (63 eV), (d) 10 ML Co/Cu(100) (69 eV), and (e) Cu(100) (67 eV).
(Color online) Normalized in-plane MOKE hysteresis loops of Fe/Mn/10 ML Co/Cu(100) with the variation of Fe and Mn thicknesses.
(Color online) Analysis results from Fig. 2. The coercivity field (Hc ) of Fe/0, 16, 24 ML Mn/10 ML Co/Cu(100) as a function of Fe thickness. Hc 1 and Hc 2 are the coercivity for the first and second switching in the two-step loops.
(Color online) The ratio of remanence (Mr )/saturation Ms for Fe/0, 16, 24 ML Mn/10 ML Co trilayers as a function of Fe thickness.
(Color online) (a) MOKE hysteresis loop of 13 ML Fe/24 ML Mn/10 ML Co/Cu(100). The numbers indicate the proposed configuration of Fe and Co moments shown in (c). (b) Total magnetic energy related to the Co layer as a function of with the variation of from + 90° to − 90° and a step of 18°. The curves for = −72° to − 90° are plotted with a smaller step of 3.6°. The arrows indicate the values at the energy minimum. (c) The minimum energy position of in (b) plotted as a function of the corresponding .
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...