1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Surface disordering and its correlations with properties in argon implanted CR-39 polymer
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3573480
/content/aip/journal/jap/109/8/10.1063/1.3573480
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/109/8/10.1063/1.3573480

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Monomer structure of CR-39 polymer.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

UV-VIS absorption spectra of CR-39 polymer: (a) virgin, and implanted at 130 keV to (b) 5 × 1014, (c) 1 × 1015, and (d) 1 × 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Plots of ln(α) vs () used to determine the Urbach energy in CR-39 polymer: (a) virgin, and implanted at 130 keV to (b) 5 × 1014, (c) 1 × 1015, and (d) 1 × 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Plots of (αhν)1/2 vs () used to determine optical bandgap in CR-39 polymer: (a) virgin, and implanted at 130 keV to (b) 5 × 1014, (c) 1 × 1015, and (d) 1 × 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Plot of Urbach’s energy (Eu ) vs optical bandgap (E opt) values for virgin and implanted CR-39 specimens.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

UV-VIS transmission spectra of CR-39 polymer: (a) virgin, and implanted at 130 keV to (b) 5 × 1014, (c) 1 × 1015, and (d) 1 × 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Raman spectra of CR-39 polymer: (a) virgin, and implanted at 130 keV to (b) 5 × 1014, (c) 1 × 1015, and (d) 1 × 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Deconvoluted Raman spectra of CR-39 polymer implanted at 130 keV to 5 × 1014, 1 × 1015, and 1 × 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Plots of ID /IG ratio vs optical bandgap (E opt) and Urbach energy (Eu ) values, respectively, for implanted CR-39 specimens at varying doses.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

GXRD patterns of CR-39 polymer: (a) virgin, and implanted at 130 keV to (b) 1015 and (c) 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Hardness–load curves of (a) virgin, and implanted at 130 keV to (b) 5 × 1014, (c) 1 × 1015, and (d) 1 × 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Hardness–depth profile of (a) virgin, and implanted at 130 keV to (b) 5 × 1014, (c) 1 × 1015, and (d) 1 × 1016 Ar+ cm−2.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Plots of Urbach energy (Eu ) and ID /IG ratio, respectively, vs KHN (GPa) values at the applied load of 9.8 mN for virgin and implanted CR-39 polymer.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Variation of optical bandgap (E opt), Urbach energy (Eu ), number of carbon atoms per cluster (M), and number of carbon atoms per conjugation length.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Values of position and intensity of D and G bands calculated from the deconvoluted Raman and value of crystallite size calculated from intensity ratio of D and G bands of implanted CR-39 specimens.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/109/8/10.1063/1.3573480
2011-04-20
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Surface disordering and its correlations with properties in argon implanted CR-39 polymer
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/109/8/10.1063/1.3573480
10.1063/1.3573480
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM