1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Magnetic hyperthermia investigation of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles: Comparison between experiment, linear response theory, and dynamic hysteresis simulations
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4729271
/content/aip/journal/jap/111/12/10.1063/1.4729271
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/111/12/10.1063/1.4729271

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Rietveld refinement pattern of sample CD1. The lower curve represents the difference between the observed and calculated profiles. Plus (+) marks represent the collected data and tick marks show the positions for the allowed reflections. The agreement factors for x-ray diffraction obtained from the Rietveld analysiswere Rp = 5.47%, Rwp = 6.70%, and χ2= 6.606.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Magnetization curves for samples CA3, CD1, and CC3 at a low field range. In the inset is shown the room temperature magnetization curves for the same samples at the whole field range.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Coercive field as function of particle size for all samples. Symbols represent experimental data whereas the solid line was calculated from Eq.(2).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Temperature variation as a function of time for samples CA3, CC3, and CD1 with an applied field of 68 Oe. The inset shows the same as before for sample CD1, but with different magnetic fields.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

SAR as a function of saturation magnetization for different values of the applied field. The inset shows SAR as a function of the coercive field for different magnetic fields.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

SAR as a function of the dimensionless magnetic anisotropy parameter for different values of the applied field. Open (closed) symbols represent experimental data (experimental data taking into account a core-shell nanoparticle), while the dashed (solid) line represent the linear response theory calculation (Eq. (1)) for a monodisperse (polydisperse) nanoparticle system.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(a) Dynamic hysteresis simulations calculated from Eq. (3) with f = 500 kHz, and and different values of the anisotropy parameter and dimensionless magnetic field . (b) vs. σ for different values of .

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Cobalt-ferrite powder samples parameters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/111/12/10.1063/1.4729271
2012-06-18
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Magnetic hyperthermia investigation of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles: Comparison between experiment, linear response theory, and dynamic hysteresis simulations
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/111/12/10.1063/1.4729271
10.1063/1.4729271
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM