Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. J. Bennett, T. Gora, P. J. Kemmey, and W. J. Kolkert, IEEE Trans. Magn. 74, 1250 (1985).
2. A. Thess, E. V. Votyakov, and Y. Kolesnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 164501 (2006).
3. R. P. Uhlig, M. Zec, H. Brauer, and A. Thess, J. Nondestruct. Eval. (submitted).
4. H. Brauer and M. Ziolkowski, Serb. J. Electr. Eng. 5, 11 (2008).
5. L. J. van der Pauw, Philips Res. Rep. 13, 1 (1958).
6. J. A. Delaney and A. B. Pippard, Rep. Prog. Phys. 35, 677 (1972).
7. R. P. Suvarna, K. R. Rao, and K. Subbarangaiah, Bull. Mater. Sci. 25, 647 (2002).
8. P. A. Davidson, An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
9. R. P. Uhlig, M. Zec, and H. Brauer, in IET 8th International Conference on Computation in Electromagnetics (CEM, 2011).
10. J. R. Reitz, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 2067 (1970).
11. J. R. Reitz and L. C. Davis, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 1547 (1972).
12. G. Rietveld, C. V. Koijmans, L. C. A. Henderson, M. J. Hall, S. Harmon, P. Warnecke, and B. Schumacher, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 52, 449 (2003).
13. S. Lee and R. Menendez, Proc. IEEE 62, 567 (1974).
14. A. Thess, E. V. Votyakov, B. Knaepen, and O. Zikanov, New J. Phys. 9 127 (2007).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



The present communication reports a new technique for the contactless measurement of the specific electrical conductivity of a solid body or an electrically conducting fluid. We term the technique “Lorentz force sigmometry” where the neologism “sigmometry” is derived from the Greek letter sigma, often used to denote the electrical conductivity. Lorentz force sigmometry (LoFoS) is based on similar principles as the traditional eddy current testing but allows a larger penetration depth and is less sensitive to variations in the distance between the sensor and the sample. We formulate the theory of LoFoS and compute the calibration function which is necessary for determining the unknown electrical conductivity from measurements of the Lorentz force. We conduct a series of experiments which demonstrate that the measured Lorentz forces are in excellent agreement with the numerical predictions. Applying this technique to an aluminum sample with a known electrical conductivity of and to a copper sample with we obtain and , respectively. This demonstrates that LoFoS is a convenient and accurate technique that may find application in process control and thermo-physical property measurements for solid and liquid conductors.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd