1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Vortex core size in unconventional superconductors
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4772670
/content/aip/journal/jap/113/1/10.1063/1.4772670
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/113/1/10.1063/1.4772670
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) The temperature dependence of superfluid density with different values of impurity scattering for -wave pairing symmetry. (b) The temperature dependence of the upper critical field with different values of impurity scattering for -wave pairing symmetry.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

The temperature dependence of superfluid density for -wave superconductors at (a) interband scattering rate with different values of intraband scattering and (b) intraband scattering rate with different values of interband scattering .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Three dimensional magnetic field dependence of the cutoff parameter with different temperatures for pairing symmetry with .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The magnetic field dependence of the cutoff parameter with different impurity scattering rates and temperatures at for pairing symmetry.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The three dimensional magnetic field dependence of the cutoff parameter with different impurity scattering rates with for pairing symmetry.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The magnetic field dependence of with different impurity scattering rates at (main panel) and (inset) for pairing symmetry.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(a) The magnetic field dependence of for superconductors with impurity scattering. The solid lines represent our solution of Eilenberger equations at for “clean” case ( ) and model ( and ). The dotted lines show result for model ( and ). Dashed line demonstrates the result of the AGL theory for from Eq. (24) . The inset shows the magnetic field dependence of mean square deviation of the distribution from the Eilenberger distribution normalized by the variance of the Eilenberger distribution, , for at (“clean”); and . (b) The interband scattering dependence of at different temperatures (intraband scattering and ) for the pairing.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

The magnetic field dependence of with the same values of intraband and interband scattering rate at for pairing symmetry. The inset shows magnetic field dependence of the cutoff parameter at with the same values of intraband and interband scattering rate ( for “clean” case and for the pairing). Dotted line shows result for model ( ).

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

The magnetic field dependence of with different impurity scattering rates with for model ( ), for pairing symmetry ( and ) and d-wave pairing symmetry ( ). The inset shows magnetic field dependence of at with different impurity scattering rates ( ) for symmetry.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/113/1/10.1063/1.4772670
2013-01-03
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Vortex core size in unconventional superconductors
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/113/1/10.1063/1.4772670
10.1063/1.4772670
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM