1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Adhesion and friction control localized folding in supported graphene
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4804265
/content/aip/journal/jap/113/19/10.1063/1.4804265
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/113/19/10.1063/1.4804265
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Representative simulation of a wrinkle-to-fold transition ((a) and (b)) of monolayer graphene upon uniaxial compression. The length of the domain along the uniaxial compression is 200 nm, the adhesion energy is 0.45 J/m, and equilibrium separation of the potential is 6 nm. A lateral view of the fold is given in (c), to be compared with the fold morphology obtained with a smaller equilibrium separation ( ) shown in (d).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Critical strains for the onset of wrinkling and the wrinkle-to-fold transition under uniaxial compression, for different van der Waals parameters and for a graphene film of length  = 200 nm. Comparisons between analytical model (lines) and numerical simulations (symbols) for both wrinkling (dashed lines, triangles) and wrinkle-to-fold (solid lines, squares) strains as a function of the equilibrium spacing of the interaction potential , and the adhesion energy γ (different colors). The inset shows the features of the interaction potential.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Illustration of the sliding of graphene as the system transits from wrinkling, with distributed excess graphene area relative to substrate area, to folding, with localized excess area (a). Critical strain for wrinkling and for the transition from wrinkling to multiple folds as a function of the frictional parameter , for a uniaxially compressed graphene sheet of length  = 1 m (b).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Separation between folds as a function of the friction parameter predicted by the theoretical model (top), checked against the simulations for four selected frictional coefficients (bottom). The color represents the out-of-plane deviation (). The inset shows as a function of in a log-log scale, to highlight the fact that the relation is not a power-law.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Different stages during the wrinkle-to-fold transition of supported graphene upon biaxial compression for a 500 nm × 500 nm sample. (a) Randomly distributed labyrinth wrinkles; (b) nucleation of short folds; (c) extension of folds at the expense of wrinkles; (d) network of folds. The areal strain is −0.01 in (a) and −0.04 in (d).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/113/19/10.1063/1.4804265
2013-05-15
2014-04-17
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Adhesion and friction control localized folding in supported graphene
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/113/19/10.1063/1.4804265
10.1063/1.4804265
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM