1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Electronically tunable aperiodic distributed feedback terahertz lasers
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4807636
/content/aip/journal/jap/113/20/10.1063/1.4807636
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/113/20/10.1063/1.4807636
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) Illustration of a packaged 6 mm long THz QCL. (b) Layer structure within the QCL. Simulated cross-sectional fundamental mode profiles within (c) a standard SI-SP waveguide at 2.85 THz and (d) the same structure after the removal of the metal overlayers. Scale bars 50 m.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) Composite SEM image of an entire 6 mm long THz QCL ridge, showing electrical contacts, bond wires and ADFB region (dashed line). Scale bar 500 m. (b) ADFB grating design. Vertical lines represent milled slits with a minimum separation of Λ, dashes represent additional Λ/2 lengths. (c) Composite SEM image of the ADFB grating milled into a THz QCL ridge. Scale bar 200 m. (d) Short section of an ADFB grating. Scale bar 50 m. (e) High-magnification image of a milled slit. Scale bar 500 nm. (f) Cross-section through a milled slit of similar depth (though wider) in a second device. Scale bar 1 m. (g) Dimensions of markers (cross and squares) milled alongside the QCL ridge with two overlapping ADFB sections (solid and dashed lines) (h) Typical marker alignment after ADFB milling, with sub-μm stitching errors in x- and y-directions. Scale bar 5 m.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

THz QCL emission spectra before (dashed) and after (solid) introduction of ADFB gratings, along with the frequency placement of the grating reflectivity responses (lower panels). Vertical dotted lines indicate the centre frequency ( ) of the grating responses.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Electrical and output power characteristics of three QCLs before and after ADFB introduction. (b) Top: thickness of the upper SI-SP waveguide layers. Below: representative SEM images of various ADFB device slits (scale bars 500 nm), along with illustrations of their estimated cross-sectional milling profiles. (c) Number of lasing modes (above a 10 dB cut-off on a normalised power scale) versus estimated milling depth. (d) Average SMSR of the dominant post-FIB lasing modes. (e) Additional losses introduced to various QCLs by FIB-milled ADFB gratings, calculated from the elevated threshold driving current densities. Trend lines (dashed) in (c)-(e) have the same exponent ( =  − 235,  = 110), revealing similar non-linearities in depth dependence of the presented device parameters.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Emission spectra from device , before and after ADFB introduction. (b) Emission spectra from device , before and after ADFB introduction. Vertical dotted lines indicate the centre frequency ( ) of the grating responses. Lower panels: ADFB reflectivity responses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/113/20/10.1063/1.4807636
2013-05-23
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Electronically tunable aperiodic distributed feedback terahertz lasers
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/113/20/10.1063/1.4807636
10.1063/1.4807636
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM