Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/jap/114/14/10.1063/1.4821342
1.
1. J. M. Boone, T. R. Nelson, K. K. Lindfors, and J. A. Seibert, “ Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose and image quality evaluation,” Radiology 221, 657677 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2213010334
2.
2. S. J. Glick, “ Breast CT,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 501526 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151924
3.
3. R. Ning, Y. Yu, D. Conover, X. Lu, H. He, Z. Chen, L. Schiffhauer, and J. Cullinan, “ Preliminary system characterization of flat panel detector-based cone-beam CT for breast imaging,” Proc. SPIE 5368, 292303 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.536231
4.
4. M. P. Tornai, R. L. McKinley, C. N. Bryzmialkiewicz, P. Madhav, S. J. Cutler, D. J. Crotty, J. E. Bowsher, E. Samei, and C. E. Floyd, “ Design and development of a fully-3D dedicated x-ray computed mammotomography system,” Proc. SPIE 5745, Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imagaging, 189 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.595636
5.
5. B. Chen and R. Ning, “ Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: Feasibility study,” Med. Phys. 29, 755770 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1461843
6.
6. W. A. Kalender, M. Beister, J. M. Boone, D. Kolditz, S. V. Vollmar, and M. C. Weigel, “ High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: Concept and feasibility considerations,” Eur. Radiol. 22, 18 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2169-4
7.
7. L. Chen, C. C. Shaw, S. Tu, and T. Wang, “ Cone-beam CT breast imaging with a flat-panel detector: A simulation study,” Proc. SPIE 5745, Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, 943 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.597065
8.
8. K. K. Lindfors, J. M. Boone, R. S. Nelson, K. Yang, A. L. C. Kwan, and D. W. Miller, “ Dedicated breast CT: Initial clinical experience,” Radiology 246, 725733 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2463070410
9.
9. A. O'Connell, D. L. Conover, Y. Zhang, P. Seifert et al., “ Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 195, 496509 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1017
10.
10. A. L. C. Kwan, J. M. Boone, K. Yang, and S-Y. Huang, “ Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner,” Med. Phys. 34, 275281 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2400830
11.
11. T. Gilat-Schmidt, “ Dedicated Breast CT: Current status and new directions,” Curr. Med. Imag. Reviews 6, 6171 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340510791268524
12.
12. J. Rowlands and J. Yorkston, “ Flat panel detectors for digital radiography,” in Handbook of Medical Imaging: Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics, edited by J. Beutel, H. Kundel, and R. VAn Metter (SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, 2000), pp. 223314.
13.
13. S. Kappler, D. Niederlohner, K. Stierstofer, and T. Flohr, “ Contrast-enhancement, image noise, and dual-energy simulations for quantum-counting clinical CT,” in SPIE Medical Imaging (San Diego, CA, 2010), Vol. 7622.
14.
14. R. Swank, “ Absorption and noise in x-ray phosphors,” J. Appl. Phys. 44, 41994203 (1973).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1662918
15.
15. T. G. Schmidt, “ Optimal ‘image-based' weighting for energy-resolved CT,” Med. Phys. 36, 30183027 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3148535
16.
16. T. G. Schmidt, “ CT energy weighting in the presence of scatter and limited energy resolution,” Med. Phys. 37, 10561067 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3301615
17.
17. H. Le, J. Ducote, and S. Molloi, “ Radiation dose reduction using a CdZnTe-based computed tomography system: Comparison to flat-panel detectors,” Med. Phys. 37, 12251236 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3312435
18.
18. P. M. Shikhaliev, “ The upper limits of the SNR in radiography and CT with polyenergetic x-rays,” Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 53175339 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/18/005
19.
19. K. S. Kalluri, M. Mahd, and S. J. Glick, “ Investigation of energy weighting using an energy discriminating photon counting detector for breast CT,” Med. Phys. 40, 081923 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4813901
20.
20. B. Zhao, H. Gao, H. Ding, and S. Molloi, “ Tight-frame based iterative image reconstruction for spectral breast CT,” Med. Phys. 40, 110 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4814112
21.
21. P. M. Shikhaliev, S. G. Fritz, and J. W. Chapman, “ Photon counting multienergy x-ray imaging: Effect of the characteristic x-rays on detector performance,” Med. Phys. 36, 51075119 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3245875
22.
22. M. E. Myronakis and D. G. Darambara, “ Monte Carlo investigation of charge-transport effects on energy resolution and detection efficiency of pixelated CZT detectors for SPECT/PET applications,” Med. Phys. 38, 455467 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3532825
23.
23. H. H. Barrett and K. J. Myers, Foundations of Image Science (John Wiley, 2003).
24.
24. G. Pellegrini, M. Maiorino, G. Blanchot, M. Chmeissani, J. Garcia, M. Lozano, R. Martinez, C. Puigdengoles, and M. Ullan, “ Direct charge sharing observation in single-photon-counting pixel detector,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 573, 137140 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.11.010
25.
25. E. Gros d'Aillon, J. Tabary, A. Gliere, and L. Verger, “ Charge sharing on monolithic CdZnTe gamma-ray detectors: A simulation study,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 563, 124127 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.01.074
26.
26. K. Taguchi, E. C. Frey, X. Wang, J. S. Iwanczyk, and W. C. Barber, “ An analytical model of the effects of pulse pileup on the energy spectrum recorded by energy resolved photon counting x-ray detectors,” Med. Phys. 37, 3957 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3429056
27.
27. K. Taguchi, M. Zhang, E. C. Frey, X. Wang, J. S. Iwanczyk, E. Nygard, N. E. Hartsough, B. M. Tsui, and W. C. Barber, “ Modeling the performance of a photon counting x-ray detector for CT: Energy response and pulse pileup effects,” Med. Phys. 38, 1089 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3539602
28.
28. M. Aslund, B. Cederstrom, M. Lundqvist, and M. Danielsson, “ Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors,” Med. Phys. 34, 19181925 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2731032
29.
29. H. Bornefalk and M. Danielsson, “ Photon-counting spectral computed tomography using silicon strip detectors: A feasibility study,” Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 19992022 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/7/014
30.
30. J. Iwanczyk, E. Nygard, J. Wessel, N. Malakhov, G. Wawrzyniak, N. Hartsough, T. Gandhi, and W. Barber, “ Breast CT using a silicon photon counting detector,” presented at the IEEE Room Temperature Semiconductor Devices, Anahiem, CA, October 2012.
31.
31. P. M. Shikhaliev, T. Xu, and S. Molloi, “ Photon counting computed tomography: Concept and initial results,” Med. Phys. 32, 427436 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1854779
32.
32. P. M. Shikhaliev, “ Tilted angle CZT detector for photon counting/energy weighting x-ray and CT imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 42674287 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/17/010
33.
33. P. M. Shikhaliev and S. G. Fritz, “ Photon counting spectral CT versus conventional CT: Comparative evaluation for breast imaging application,” Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 19051930 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/7/001
34.
34. H. Ding, J. L. Ducote, and S. Molloi, “ Breast composition measurement with a cadmium-zinc-telluride based spectral computed tomography system,” Med. Phys. 39, 12891297 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3681273
35.
35. C. Szeles, S. Soldner, S. Vydrin, J. Graves, and D. Bale, “ CdZnTe semiconductor detectors for spectroscopic x-ray imaging,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 35, 572582 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2007.914034
36.
36. D. Bale and C. Szeles, “ Nature of polarization in wide-bandgap semiconductor detectors under high-flux irradiation: Application to semi-insulating CdZnTe,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 035205 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.035205
37.
37. B. Heismann, D. Niederloehner, P. Hackenschmied, M. Strassburg, S. Janssen, and S. Wirth, “ Spectral and spatial resolution of semiconductor detectors in medical x- and gamma ray imaging,” in IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (2008), pp. 7883.
38.
38. S. J. Glick, S. Thacker, X. Gong, and B. Liu, “ Evaluating the impact of x-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging,” Med. Phys. 34, 524 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2388574
39.
39. M. Weigel, S. V. Vollmar, and W. A. Kalender, “ Spectral optimization for dedicated breast CT,” Med. Phys. 38, 114124 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3523599
40.
40. R. L. McKinley, M. P. Tornai, E. Samei, and M. L. Bradshaw, “ Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography,” Med. Phys. 31, 800813 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1668371
41.
41. F. Salvat, J. Fernandez-Varea, and J. Sempau, "PENELOPE, A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electrons and Photon Transport (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2003), available in PDF format at http://www.nea.fr.
42.
42. J. M. Boone, T. R. Fewell, and R. J. Jennings, “ Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography,” Med. Phys. 24, 18631874 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598100
43.
43. E. Roessl and R. Proska, “ K-edge imaging in x-ray computed tomography using multi-bin photon counting detectors,” Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 46794696 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/020
44.
44. J. Schlomka, E. Roessl, R. Dorscheid, S. Dill, G. Martens, T. Istel, C. Baumer, C. Herrmann, R. Steadman, G. Zeitler, A. Livne, and R. Proska, “ Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 40314047 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/15/002
45.
45. J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, “ A simplex-method for function minimization,” Comput. J. 7, 308313 (1965).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
46.
46. R. L. Siddon, “ Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array,” Med. Phys. 12, 252255 (1985).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.595715
47.
47. S. Thacker and S. J. Glick, “ Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 54335444 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/24/003
48.
48. P. C. Johns and M. J. Yaffe, “ X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues,” Phys. Med. Biol. 32, 675695 (1987).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/32/6/002
49.
49.NIST, “Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients,” (2013), http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/xraycoef/.
50.
50. P. M. Shikhaliev, “ Energy-resolved computed tomography: First experimental results,” Med. Phys. 53, 55955613 (2008).
51.
51. G. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2000).
52.
52. M. Krause, “ Atomic radiative and radiationless yields for K and L shells,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8, 307329 (1979).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.555594
53.
53. T. G. Schmidt, “ An empirical method for correcting the detector spectral response in energy-resolved CT,” in SPIE Medical Imaging (San Diego, CA, 2012), Vol. 8313.
54.
54. S. J. Glick and C. S. Didier, “ The effect of characteristic x-rays on the spatial and spectral resolution of a CZT based detector for breast CT,” Proc. SPIE Med. Imaging 7961, 796110 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.877784
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/114/14/10.1063/1.4821342
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jap/114/14/10.1063/1.4821342
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/114/14/10.1063/1.4821342
2013-10-10
2016-12-06

Abstract

A number of research groups have been investigating the use of dedicated breast computerized tomography (CT). Preliminary results have been encouraging, suggesting an improved visualization of masses on breast CT as compared to conventional mammography. Nonetheless, there are many challenges to overcome before breast CT can become a routine clinical reality. One potential improvement over current breast CT prototypes would be the use of photon counting detectors with cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) (or CdTe) semiconductor material. These detectors can operate at room temperature and provide high detection efficiency and the capability of multi-energy imaging; however, one factor in particular that limits image quality is the emission of characteristic x-rays. In this study, the degradative effects of characteristic x-rays are examined when using a CZT detector under breast CT operating conditions. Monte Carlo simulation software was used to evaluate the effect of characteristic x-rays and the detector element size on spatial and spectral resolution for a CZT detector used under breast CT operating conditions. In particular, lower kVp spectra and thinner CZT thicknesses were studied than that typically used with CZT based conventional CT detectors. In addition, the effect of characteristic x-rays on the accuracy of material decomposition in spectral CT imaging was explored. It was observed that when imaging with 50-60 kVp spectra, the x-ray transmission through CZT was very low for all detector thicknesses studied (0.5–3.0 mm), thus retaining dose efficiency. As expected, characteristic x-ray escape from the detector element of x-ray interaction increased with decreasing detector element size, approaching a 50% escape fraction for a 100 m size detector element. The detector point spread function was observed to have only minor degradation with detector element size greater than 200 m and lower kV settings. Characteristic x-rays produced increasing distortion in the spectral response with decreasing detector element size. If not corrected for, this caused a large bias in estimating tissue density parameters for material decomposition. It was also observed that degradation of the spectral response due to characteristic x-rays caused worsening precision in the estimation of tissue density parameters. It was observed that characteristic x-rays do cause some degradation in the spatial and spectral resolution of thin CZT detectors operating under breast CT conditions. These degradations should be manageable with careful selection of the detector element size. Even with the observed spectral distortion from characteristic x-rays, it is still possible to correctly estimate tissue parameters for material decomposition using spectral CT if accurate modeling is used.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/jap/114/14/1.4821342.html;jsessionid=4Ce1-chR4v0qeZdI6pgNoMXr.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/jap/114/14/10.1063/1.4821342&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/jap
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=jap.aip.org/114/14/10.1063/1.4821342&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jap/114/14/10.1063/1.4821342'
Right1,Right2,Right3,