No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Comment on “Comparative analysis of glass-formation in binary, ternary, and multicomponent alloys” [J. Appl. Phys. 108
, 103511 (2010)]
3. C. Dong, Q. Wang, J. Qiang, Y. Wang, N. Jiang, G. Han, Y. Li, J. Wu, and J. Xia, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, R273 (2007).
4. G. Han, J. Qiang, F. Li, L. Yuan, S. Quan, Q. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Dong, and P. Häussler, Acta Mater. 59, 5917 (2011).
Article metrics loading...
Best ternary bulk metallic glass formers A44B38C18, A44B43C13, A65B25C10, A56B32C12, A55B28C17, A70B20C10, and A65B20C15 are quantitatively explained using the cluster-plus-glue-atom model.
Full text loading...
Most read this month