1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
An improved model for nanosecond pulsed laser ablation of metals
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4818513
/content/aip/journal/jap/114/8/10.1063/1.4818513
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/114/8/10.1063/1.4818513
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Aluminum electrical and thermal conductivities from 298 K to 6030 K.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Aluminum real and imaginary parts of refractive index at wavelength 1064 nm from 298 K to 6030 K.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Continuous temperature distribution, (b) temperature distribution at selected times, and (c) reflectivity of an aluminum target exposed to single 1 J cm pulse of duration 1 ns and wavelength 515 nm.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Continuous temperature distribution, (b) temperature distribution at selected times, and (c) reflectivity of an aluminum target exposed to single 2 J cm pulse of duration 1 ns and wavelength 515 nm.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Continuous temperature distribution, (b) temperature distribution at selected times, and (c) reflectivity of an aluminum target exposed to single 3 J cm pulse of duration 10 ns and wavelength 515 nm.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

(a) Continuous temperature distribution, (b) temperature distribution at selected times, and (c) reflectivity of an aluminum target exposed to single 6 J cm pulse of duration 10 ns and wavelength 515 nm.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Calculated ablation depth of aluminum for wavelength 1064 nm and pulse duration 4.5 ns with various shielding coefficients.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Calculated ablation depth of aluminum for wavelength 1064 nm and pulse duration 5 ns ( ) with experimental results of Porneala and Willis. Experimental data reproduced with permission from IOP Publishing. All rights reserved. © 2009, IOP Publishing (iopscience.iop.org).

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Calculated ablation depth of aluminum for wavelength 1064 nm and pulse duration 4.5 ns ( ) with experimental results of Stafe Experimental data reproduced with permission from the Publishing House of the Romanian Academy. All rights reserved. © 2008, The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy (www.ear.ro).

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Calculated ablation depth of aluminum for wavelength 532 nm and pulse duration 10 ns ( ) with experimental results of Colina Experimental data reproduced with permission from Maney Publishing. All rights reserved. © 2011, Maney Publishing (www.maneypublishing.com/journals/sur, www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/se).

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Phase explosion threshold of aluminum as a function of pulse duration for wavelengths 266, 515, 780, and 1064 nm.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Phase explosion threshold of aluminum as a function of sample thickness for various laser sources.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/114/8/10.1063/1.4818513
2013-08-26
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: An improved model for nanosecond pulsed laser ablation of metals
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/114/8/10.1063/1.4818513
10.1063/1.4818513
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM