Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. L. W. Alvarez et al., “Search for hidden chambers in pyramids,” Science 167(3919), 832 (1970).
2. E. P. George, “Cosmic rays measure overburden of tunnel,” Commonwealth Eng. 455457 (1955).
3. K. Nagamine, “Geo-tomographic observation of inner-structure of volcano with cosmic-ray muons,” J. Geogr. 104(7), 9981007 (1995).
4. K. Nagamine et al., “Method of probing inner-structure of geophysical substance with the horizontal cosmic-ray muons and possible application to volcanic eruption prediction,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 356(2/3), 585 (1995).
5. K. Nagamine et al., “Probing the inner structure of blast furnaces by cosmic-ray muon radiography,” Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B 81(7), 257260 (2005).
6. C. L. Morris et al., “Charged particle radiography,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 76(4), 046301 (2013).
7. K. N. Borozdin et al., “Surveillance: Radiographic imaging with cosmic-ray muons,” Nature 422(6929), 277 (2003).
8. W. C. Priedhorsky et al., “Detection of high-Z objects using multiple scattering of cosmic ray muons,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74(10), 4294 (2003).
9. L. J. Schultz et al., “Statistical reconstruction for cosmic ray muon tomography,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(8), 19851993 (2007).
10. L. J. Schultz et al., “Image reconstruction and material Z discrimination via cosmic ray muon radiography,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 519(3), 687 (2004).
11. V. Anghel et al., “Performance of a drift chamber candidate for a cosmic muon tomography system,” in 11th International Conference on Applications of Nuclear Techniques, Rethymnon, Greece, 12–18 June 2011 (American Institute of Physics, USA, 2011).
12. J. Armitage et al., “Cosmic ray inspection and passive tomography for SNM detection,” in International Conference on Applications of Nuclear Techniques, Crete, Greece, 14–20 June 2009 (American Institute of Physics, USA, 2009).
13. M. Benettoni et al., “Muon radiography with the CMS muon barrel chambers,” in 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2007).
14. W. B. Gilboy et al., “Industrial radiography with cosmic-ray muons: A progress report,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 580(1), 785787 (2007).
15. K. Gnanvo et al., “Imaging of high-Z material for nuclear contraband detection with a minimal prototype of a muon tomography station based on GEM detectors,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 652(1), 1620 (2011).
16. C. L. Morris et al., “Tomographic imaging with cosmic ray muons,” Sci. Global Security 16(1–2), 3753 (2008).
17. C. L. Morris et al., “Obtaining material identification with cosmic ray radiography,” AIP Adv. 2(4), 042128 (2012).
18. T. Fawcett, “An introduction to ROC analysis,” Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27(8), 861874 (2006).
19. J. Perry et al., “Imaging a nuclear reactor using cosmic ray muons,” J. Appl. Phys. 113(18), 184909 (2013).
20. G. R. Lynch and O. I. Dahl, “Approximations to multiple Coulomb scattering,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 58(1), 6 (1991).
21. C. L. Morris et al., “A new method for imaging nuclear threats using cosmic ray muons,” AIP Adv. 3(8), 0821286 (2013).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



We compare different algorithms for detecting a 5 cm tungsten cube using cosmic ray muon technology. In each case, a simple tomographic technique was used for position reconstruction, but the scattering angles were used differently to obtain a density signal. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare images made using average angle squared, median angle squared, average of the squared angle, and a multi-energy group fit of the angular distributions for scenes with and without a 5 cm tungsten cube. The receiver operating characteristic curves show that the multi-energy group treatment of the scattering angle distributions is the superior method for image reconstruction.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd