No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Response to “Comment on ‘Effective thermal conductivity of metal and non-metal particulate composites with interfacial thermal resistance at high volume fraction of nano to macro-sized spheres’” [J. Appl. Phys. 117
, 216101 (2015)]
5. R. Pal, “ Comment on ‘Effective thermal conductivity of metal and non-metal particulate composites with interfacial thermal resistance at high volume fraction of nano to macro-sized spheres,” J. Appl. Phys. 117, 216101 (2015).
6. D. A. G. Bruggeman, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 24, 636–679 (1935).
Article metrics loading...
In this response, we clarify some of the misconceptions that were brought up by Pal's Comments about our manuscript [S. A. Faroughi and C. Huber, J. Appl. Phys. 117, 055104 (2015)]. The main issue that was raised is that we account for the correction on the excluded volume (the net volume of the continuous phase in a finite composite decreases with increasing filler content) twice. We show here that this statement is incorrect and that our model is consistent with other models derived from a different standpoint. We also address the other comments raised by Pal.
Full text loading...
Most read this month