Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/jap/118/2/10.1063/1.4926474
1.
1. P. Jung, G. Gray, R. Roy, and P. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1873 (1990), see Fig. 1.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1873
2.
2. L. Yaowen, P. Huican, Z. Hong, and W. Yinghai, Phys. Lett. A 262, 416 (1999), see Fig. 1(a).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00589-7
3.
3. Š. Barta and P. Dieška, J. Electr. Eng. 51, 113 (2000).
4.
4. W. Xiong and J. E. Ferrell, Nature 426, 460 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02089
5.
5. C. L. Creel and J. Ross, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 3779 (1976).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.433568
6.
6. O. H. Schmitt, J. Sci. Instrum. 15, 24 (1938).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0950-7671/15/1/305
7.
7. C.-K. Pham, in Proceedings of the 6th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science ( IEEE, 2007), p. 48.
8.
8. C.-E. D. Chen, M. Matloubian, R. Sundaresan, B.-Y. Mao, C. C. Wei, and G. P. Pollack, IEEE Electron Devices Lett. 9, 636 (1988).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/55.20420
9.
9. A. V. Khomenko and I. A. Lyashenko, Phys. Lett. A 366, 165 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.02.010
10.
10. D. N. Maywar, G. P. Agrawal, and Y. Nakano, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 18, 1003 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.18.001003
11.
11. N. K. Metzger, K. Dholakia, and E. M. Wright, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 068102 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.068102
12.
12. D. Vollath and F. D. Fisher, J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 1485 (2009), see Figs. 5, 6, and 16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9597-y
13.
13. B. Walker, Cataclysmic Variable Stars ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995), p. 173.
14.
14. A. Berti, C. Giorgi, and E. Vuk, Appl. Math. Modell. 39, 820 (2015), see Figs. 4, 6, 9, and 15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.004
15.
15. R. G. Harrison, IEEE Trans. Magn. 39, 950 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2003.808590
16.
16. R. G. Harrison, IEEE Trans. Magn. 45, 1922 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2008.2008010
17.
17. R. G. Harrison, IEEE Trans. Magn. 47, 175 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2010.2089528
18.
18. R. G. Harrison, IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 1115 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2011.2170846
19.
19. R. G. Harrison, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 033901 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4861869
20.
20. B. Alessandro, C. Beatrice, G. Bertotti, and A. Montorsi, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2901 (1990).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.346423
21.
21.ABBM20 used the convention B = μ0H + M; but here, we use the S.I. convention B = μ0 (H + M).
22.
22. J. Sablik, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 5898 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.354167
23.
23. D. C. Jiles, Czech. J. Phys. 50(8), 893 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022846128461
24.
24. N. P. Gaunkar, O. Kypris, I. C. Nlebedim, and D. C. Jiles, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 7301004 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2335204
25.
25. D. M. Stewart, K. J. Stevens, and A. B. Kaiser, Curr. Appl. Phys. 4, 308 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2003.11.035
26.
26. I. Altpeter, G. Dobmann, M. Kröning, M. Rabung, and S. Szielasko, NDT&E Int. 42, 283 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.11.007
27.
27. M. Rosipal, M. Neslušan, V. Ochodek, and M. Šípek, Mater. Eng. 17, 11 (2010).
28.
28. H. I. Yelbay, I. Cam, and C. H. Gür, “ Non-destructive determination of residual stress state in steel weldments by magnetic Barkhausen noise technique,” NDT&E Int. 43, 29 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.003
29.
29. A. Sorsa, K. Leiviskä, S. Santa-aho, and T. Lepistö, NDT&E Int. 46, 100 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.11.008
30.
30. X. Kléber, A. Hug, J. Merlin, and M. Soler, ISIJ Int. 44, 1033 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.44.1033
31.
31. C. C. H. Lo, C. B. Scruby, and G. D. W. Smith, Phil. Mag. 84, 1821 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786430410001663196
32.
32. I. Altpeter, J. Nondestr. Eval. 15, 45 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00729134
33.
33. J. A. Baldwin and F. Miller, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 4739 (1973).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1662028
34.
34. D. Spasojević, S. Bukvić, S. Milošević, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2531 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2531
35.
35. O. Narayan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3855 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3855
36.
36. S. Zapperi, P. Cizeau, G. Durin, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. B 58, 6353 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.6353
37.
37. S. Zapperi, C. Castellano, F. Colaiori, and G. Durin, Nat. Phys. 1, 46 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys101
38.
38. X. Kléber, R. Borelly, and A. Vincent, Rev. Metall. 98, 201 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/metal:2001174
39.
39. J. A. Pérez-Benitez, J. Capó-Sánchez, J. Anglada-Rivera, and L. R. Padovese, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 288, 433 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.09.134
40.
40. D. K. Bhattacharya and S. Vaidyanathan, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 166, 111 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(96)00444-1
41.
41. J. Pearson, P. T. Squire, and D. Atkinson, IEEE Trans. Magn. 33, 3970 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/20.619632
42.
42. J. H. Carpenter, K. A. Dahmen, J. P. Sethna, G. Friedman, S. Loverde, and A. Vanderveld, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 6799 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1358328
43.
43. H. Nakamura and M. Kitada, J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 56, 849 (1992)
44.
44. R. P. Feynman, “ It is not possible to understand the magnetic effects of materials in any honest way from the point of view of classical physics. Such magnetic effects are a completely quantum-mechanical phenomenon,” Lectures on Physics, Vol. II ( Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1964), p. 34-2.
45.
45. E. Puppin, P. Vavassori, and L. Callegaro, Rev. Sci. Inst. 71, 1752 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1150532
46.
46. B. C. Satishkumar, A. Govindaraj, P. V. Vanitha, A. K. Raychaudhuri, and C. N. R. Rao, Chem. Phys. Lett. 362, 301 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01082-5
47.
47. B. D. Cullity, Introduction to Magnetic Materials ( Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1972), p. 105.
48.
48. S. Chikazumi, Physics of Magnetism ( Wiley, New York, 1964), p. 63.
49.
49. J. S. Amaral, S. Das, and V. S. Amaral, in Thermodynamics–Systems in Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium, edited by J. C. Moreno-Piraján ( Intech, 2011), Chap. 8.
50.
50. G. Zheng, M. Padarvi-Horvath, X. Huang, B. Kesei, and J. Vandlik, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 5742 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.362236
51.
51. F. Colaiori, Adv. Phys. 57, 287 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00018730802420614
52.
52. B. Alessandro, C. Beatrice, G. Bertotti, and A. Montorsi, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2908 (1990).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.346424
53.
53. M. J. Sablik and B. Augustyniak, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 963 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.360880
54.
54. O. Saquet, J. Chicois, and A. Vincent, Mater. Sci. Eng. A269, 73 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00155-0
55.
55. H. J. Williams, W. Shockley, and C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 80, 1090 (1950).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.80.1090
56.
56. G. Bertotti, F. Fiorillo, and M. P. Sassi, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 23, 136 (1981)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(81)90127-X
57.
57. K. P. O' Brien and M. B. Weissman, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3446 (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.3446
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/118/2/10.1063/1.4926474
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jap/118/2/10.1063/1.4926474
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/118/2/10.1063/1.4926474
2015-07-09
2016-12-10

Abstract

A mean-field positive-feedback (PFB) theory of ferromagnetism is used to explain the origin of Barkhausen noise (BN) and to show why it is most pronounced in the irreversible regions of the hysteresis loop. By incorporating the ABBM-Sablik model of BN into the PFB theory, we obtain analytical solutions that simultaneously describe both the major hysteresis loop and, by calculating separate expressions for the differential susceptibility in the irreversible and reversible regions, the BN power response at all points of the loop. The PFB theory depends on summing components of the applied field, in particular, the non-monotonic field-magnetization relationship characterizing hysteresis, associated with physical processes occurring in the material. The resulting physical model is then validated by detailed comparisons with measured single-peak BN data in three different steels. It also agrees with the well-known influence of a demagnetizing field on the position and shape of these peaks. The results could form the basis of a physics-based method for modeling and understanding the significance of the observed single-peak (and in multi-constituent materials, multi-peak) BN envelope responses seen in contemporary applications of BN, such as quality control in manufacturing, non-destructive testing, and monitoring the microstructural state of ferromagnetic materials.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/jap/118/2/1.4926474.html;jsessionid=IsPuFYvYk-HvL6fksTz6LtgP.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/jap/118/2/10.1063/1.4926474&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/jap
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=jap.aip.org/118/2/10.1063/1.4926474&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jap/118/2/10.1063/1.4926474'
Right1,Right2,Right3,