No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Resolving the biophysics of axon transmembrane polarization in a single closed-form description
2. J. B. Hursh, “ Conduction velocity and diameter of nerve fibers,” Am. J. Physiol. 127, 131–139 (1939).
8. J. Koester and S. A. Siegelbaum, in Principles of Neural Science, edited by E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, and T. M. Jessell ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000), pp. 140–149.
10. R. E. Taylor, in Physical Techniques in Biological Research, edited by W. L. Natsiik ( Academic Press, New York, 1963), pp. 219–262.
12. W. Rall and J. Segev, The Theoretical Foundation of Dendritic Function: Selected Papers of Wilfrid Rall with Commentaries ( MIT Press, Boston, MA, 1995).
13. M. London, C. Meunier, and I. Segev, “ Signal transfer in passive dendrites with nonuniform membrane conductance,” J. Neurosci. 19, 8219–8233 (1999).
14. F. Nadim and J. Golowasch, “ Signal transmission between gap-junctionally coupled passive cables is most effective at an optimal diameter,” J. Neurophysiol. 95, 3831–3843 (2006).
16. W. Rall, Core Conductor Theory and Cable Properties of Neurons: Handbook of Physiology, the Nervous System, Cellular Biology of Neurons ( American Physiological Society, 1977), pp. 39–93.
17. R. West, E. Schutter, and G. Wilcox, in The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications: Evolutionary Algorithms, edited by L. D. Davis et al. ( Springer, New York, 1999), pp. 33–64.
19. J. J. B. Jack, D. Noble, and R. W. Tsien, Electric Current Flow in Excitable Cells ( Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975).
20. D. Sterratt, Principles of Computational Modelling in Neuroscience ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
21. R. Hobbie, Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology ( AIP Press, New York, 1997).
22. R. Plonsey and R. Barr, Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach ( Springer, Boston, 2000).
23. J. Malmivuo and R. Plonsey, Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields ( Oxford University Press, New York, 2000).
26. R. S. Wijesinghe, “ Detection of magnetic fields created by biological tissues,” J. Electr. Electron. Syst. 3, 1–7 (2014).
27. B. Greenebaum and F. Barnes, Bioengineering and Biophysical Aspects of Electromagnetic Fields ( CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2007).
29. V. N. Varfolomeev et al., “ Paramagnetic properties of hepatic tissues and transplantable hepatomas,” Biofizika 21, 881–886 (1976).
30. R. Pethig and D. B. Kell, “ The passive electrical properties of biological systems: their significance in physiology, biophysics and biotechnology,” Phys. Med. Biol. 32, 933–970 (1987).
31. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics ( Wiley, New York, 2008).
32. W. T. Coffey, Y. P. Kalmykov, and J. T. Waldron, The Langevin Equation, with Applications in Physics, Chemistry, and Electrical Engineering ( World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1996).
33. J. Koester and S. A. Siegelbaum, in Principles of Neural Science, edited by E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, and T. M. Jessell ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000), pp. 150–169.
35. E. O. Hernández-Ochoa and M. F. Schneider, “ Voltage clamp methods for the study of membrane currents and SR Ca2+ release in adult skeletal muscle fibres,” Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 108, 98–118 (2012).
36.The Axon: Structure, Function and Pathophysiology, edited by S. G. Waxman, J. D. Kocsis, and P. K. Stys ( Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
37. A. V. Holden, P. G. Haydon, and W. Winlow, “ Multiple equilibria and exotic behavior in excitable membranes,” Biol. Cybern. 46, 167–172 (1983).
39. H. R. Leuchtag, Voltage-Sensitive Ion Channels: Biophysics of Molecular Excitability ( Springer, New York, Philadelphia, 2008).
40. D. A. Hill, Electromagnetic Fields in Cavities: Deterministic and Statistical Theories ( IEEE Press Series on Electromagnetic Wave Theory, NJ, 2009).
41. D. A. McQuarrie, Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers ( University Science Books, CA, 2003).
43. G. Zhao, Z. Hou, and H. Xin, “ Frequency-selective response of FitzHugh-Nagumo neuron networks via changing random edges,” Chaos 16, 043107 (2006).
44. S. Y. Gordleeva et al., “ Bi-directional astrocytic regulation of neuronal activity within a network,” Front. Comput. Neurosci. 6, 104–114 (2012).
49. N. F. Britton, Essential Mathematical Biology ( Springer-Verlag, London, 2003).
50. J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology I: An Introduction ( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002).
51. E. O. Voit, A First Course in Systems Biology ( Garland Science, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2013).
52. G. B. Arfken, H. J. Weber, and F. E. Harris, Mathematical Methods for Physicist: A Comprehensive Guide ( Elsevier, MA, 2013).
53. E. Weisstein, CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics ( CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2003).
Article metrics loading...
When a depolarizing event occurs across a cell membrane there is a remarkable change in its electrical properties. A complete depolarization event produces a considerably rapid increase in voltage that propagates longitudinally along the axon and is accompanied by changes in axial conductance. A dynamically changing magnetic field is associated with the passage of the action potential down the axon. Over 75 years of research has gone into the quantification of this phenomenon. To date, no unified model exist that resolves transmembrane polarization in a closed-form description. Here, a simple but formative description of propagated signaling phenomena in the membrane of an axon is presented in closed-form. The focus is on using both biophysics and mathematical methods for elucidating the fundamental mechanisms governing transmembrane polarization. The results presented demonstrate how to resolve electromagnetic and thermodynamic factors that govern transmembrane potential. Computational results are supported by well-established quantitative descriptions of propagated signaling phenomena in the membrane of an axon. The findings demonstrate how intracellular conductance, the thermodynamics of magnetization, and current modulation function together in generating an action potential in a unified closed-form description. The work presented in this paper provides compelling evidence that three basic factors contribute to the propagated signaling in the membrane of an axon. It is anticipated this work will compel those in biophysics, physical biology, and in the computational neurosciences to probe deeper into the classical and quantum features of membrane magnetization and signaling. It is hoped that subsequent investigations of this sort will be advanced by the computational features of this model without having to resort to numerical methods of analysis.
Full text loading...
Most read this month