No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Current Voltage Characteristics of Germanium Tunnel Diodes
1.L. Esaki, Phys. Rev. 109, 603 (1958).
2.L. Esaki and Y. Miyahara, Solid State Electronics 1, 13 (1960).
3.N. Holonyak, I. A. Lesk, R. N. Hall, J. J. Tiemann, and H. Ehrenreich, Phys. Rev. Letters 3, 167 (1959);
3.R. N. Hall, Proceedings International Conference on Semiconductors, Prague, 1960 (Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 1961), p. 193.
4.S. L. Miller, M. I. Nathan, and A. C. Smith, Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 60 (1960);
4.M. I. Nathan and W. Paul, Proceedings International Conference on Semiconductors, Prague, 1960 (Publishing House of the Czeckoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 1961), p. 209.
5.A. G. Chynoweth, W. L. Feldman, C. A. Lee, R. A. Logan, G. L. Pearson, and P. Aigrain, Phys. Rev. 118, 425 (1960);
5.A. G. Chynoweth and R. A. Logan, Phys. Rev. 118, 1470 (1960).
6.P. J. Price and J. M. Radcliffe, IBM J. Research and Develop. 3, 364 (1959).
7.E. O. Kane, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 83 (1961).
8.W. Shockly, Bell System Tech. J. 28, 435 (1949).
9.J. V. Morgan and E. O. Kane, Phys. Rev. Letters 3, 466 (1959).
10.M. I. Nathan and W. Paul (to be published).
11.L. V. Keldysh, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. U.S.S.R. 34, 962 (1958)
11.[translation: L. V. Keldysh, Soviet Phys.‐JETP 34 (7), 665 (1958)].
12.Eq. (38) of reference 6, which gives the value of A, contains an arithmetic error and is too large by a factor
13.The numerical value of the ratio of direct to phonon current quoted on p. 88 of reference 7 is in error. E. O. Kane (private communication).
14.J. C. Marinace (private communication).
15.W. P. Dumke (private communcation).
16.E. O. Kane, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 12, 181 (1960).
17.J. C. Phillips, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 12, 208 (1960).
18.A summary of high pressure results is given in W. Paul, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 8, 196 (1959).
19.A similar calculation for has been made by P. J. Price, IBM Research Note NW‐2. He obtains a value a factor of two larger. The difference is mainly due to the use of a different value of the the phonon matrix element.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month