No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Comparison of Various Microwave Breakdown Prediction Models
1.J. T. Mayhan and R. V. DeVore, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 5746 (1968).
2.J. T. Mayhan and R. L. Fante, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 449 (1969).
3.J. T. Mayhan and R. L. Fante, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 5207 (1969).
4.The value of the collision frequency for air is not greatly affected by contaminants, although it is changed by very strong fields. A table of effective collision frequency as a function of contaminant level and electric field strength is given in Table I. We have used the value of 5.3 to correspond to the average over the table.
5.L. Gould and L. W. Roberts, J. Appl. Phys. 27, 1162 (1956).
6.W. P. Allis and P. J. Rose, Phys. Rev. 93, 84 (1954).
7.M. Mentzoni (private communication).
8.G. C. Light, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1715 (1969).
9.J. T. Mayhan, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation AP‐17, 251 (1969).
10.M. Epstein, Transactions of 8th Symposium on Ballistic Missile and Space Technology (unpublished), p. 298 (1963).
11.T. Flynn, ElectroScience Lab. Rept. No. 2151–3, The Ohio State University, 1967 (unpublished).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month