No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A relationship between defect resistivity and bulk resistivity at the melting temperature
1.See, for example, C. P. Flynn, Point Defects and Diffusion (Oxford U.P., London, 1972), p. 781.
2.V. K. Tewary, J. Phys. F 3, 704 (1973).
3.J. S. Koehler, in Fundamental Aspects of Radiation Damage in Metals, edited by M. T. Robinson and F. W. Young, Jr. (U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C., 1975), Vol. 1, p. 397 (1975).
4.It is worth bearing in mind that none of the correlations between defect and bulk properties mentioned above is understood entirely satisfactorily.
5.P. G. Lucasson and R. M. Walker, Phys. Rev. 127, 1130 (1962).
6.H. Wenzl, in Vacancies and Interstitial in Metals, edited by A. Seeger, D. Schumacher, W. Schilling, and J. Diehl (North‐Holland, Amsterdam, 1969), p. 376.
7.P. Ehrhart, H. G. Haubold, and W. Schilling, Festkoeperprobleme 14, 87 (1974).
8.P. Ehrhart, Ref. 3, p. 302; and private communication.
9.P. Lucasson, Ref. 3, p. 42.
10.P. Jung, R. L. Chaplin, H. J. Fenzl, K. Reichelt, and P. Wombacher, Phys. Rev. B 8, 553 (1973).
11.P. Jung and W. Schilling, Phys. Rev. B 5, 2046 (1972).
12.R. R. Bourassa and B. Lengeler, J. Phys. F 6, 1405 (1976).
13.Y. Fukai, Philos. Mag. 20, 1277 (1969);
13.J. Bass, Philos. Mag. 15, 717 (1967).
14.R. W. Siegel, Philos. Mag. 13, 337 (1966);
14.R. W. Siegel, 13, 359 (1966)., Philos. Mag.
15.C. G. Wang, D. N. Seidman, and R. W. Balluffi, Phys. Rev. 169, 553 (1968).
16.B. Lengeler and R. R. Bourassa, J. Nucl. Mater. (to be published).
17.A. S. Berger, D. N. Seidman, and R. W. Balluffi, Acta Metall. 21, 123 (1973);
17.A. S. Berger, D. N. Seidman, and R. W. Balluffi, 21, 137 (1973)., Acta Metall.
18.We have not plotted vacancy‐resistivity values derived from analyses of high‐temperature resistivity data, e.g., R. O. Simmons and R. W. Balluffi, Phys. Rev. 117, 60 (1960);
18.A. Ascoli, G. Guarini, and G. T. Queirolo, Cryst. Lattice Defects 1, 159 (1970). Values of obtained in this manner are considerably higher than those found in quenching experiments. The reason for this discrepancy is not fully understood at present.
19.J. M. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons (Oxford U.P., Oxford, 1960), p. 283.
20.M. P. Greene and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 137, A513 (1965).
21.J. W. Ekin and A. Bringer, Phys. Rev. B 7, 4468 (1973).
22.W. A. Harrison, Pseudopotentials in the Theory of Metals (Benjamin, New York, 1966);
22.V. Heine and D. Weaire, in Solid State Physics, edited by H. Ehrenreich, F. Seitz, and D. Turnbull (Academic, New York, 1970).
23.J. M. Ziman, Adv. Phys. 13, 89 (1964).
24.R. Benedek, Ph.D. thesis (Brown University, 1972) (unpublished).
25.J. D. Eshelby, J. Appl. Phys. 25, 255 (1954). The image field gives rise to a uniform dilatation of the crystal, which, to lowest order, does not affect the residual resistivity.
26.L. J. Sham and J. M. Ziman, in Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic, New York, 1963), Vol. 15, p. 263.
27.See, for example, D. Pines, Elementary Excitations in Solids (Benjamin, New York, 1964), p. 34.
28.A. Seeger, J. Phys. F 3, 248 (1973).
29.O. Dreirach, J. Phys. F 3, 577 (1973);
29.S. N. Khanna and A. Jain, J. Phys. F 4, 1982 (1974).
30.W. Schilling (private communication).
31.H. B. Huntington and A. R. Grone, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 20, 76 (1961).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month