No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Comparison of two equation‐of‐state models for partially ionized aluminum: Zel’dovich and Raizer’s model versus the activity expansion code
1.Y. B. Zel’dovich and Y. P. Raizer, Physics of Shock Waves and High‐Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Academic New York, 1966), Vol. I, Chap. 3;
1.Y. P. Raizer, Soviet Phys. JETP 9, 1124 (1959).
2.R. J. Harrach and R. E. Kidder, Phys. Rev. A 23, 887 (1981).
3.W. C. Martin and R. Zalubas, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8, 817 (1979);
3.C. W. Allen, Astrophysical Quantities (Athlone, London, 1973), Sec. 16, Chap. 3.
4.F. J. Rogers, “Statistical Mechanics of Reacting Dense Plasmas,” in Proceedings of the ONR Conference on Dense Plasmas, Nov. 1978, Pasadena, Calif.;
4.see also Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report UCRL‐81936, November, 1978.
5.F. J. Rogers, Phys. Rev. A 10, 2441 (1974).
6.F. J. Rogers and H. E. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. A 8, 1061 (1973).
7.Activity is defined and discussed by, e.g., P. S. Epstein, Textbook of Thermodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1937), Chap. XI.
7.A simple physical interpretation of the activity expansion for short‐range interactions is given by J. E. Mayer, Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1968), p. 81.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month