Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Stress measurements using piezoresistance gauges: Modeling the gauge as an elastic‐plastic inclusion
1.R. A. Graham and J. R. Asay, High Temp.‐High Pressures 10, 355 (1978).
2.P. S. DeCarli, “Stress‐Gage System for the Megabar (100 GPa) Range,” Defense Nuclear Agency, Final Report 4066F (1976) (unpublished).
3.See Proceedings of the First Symposium on Gauges and Piezoresistive Materials, Archaeon, France. Organized by Le CEA, ADERA Bordeauz, and CNRS (1981).
4.Y. M. Gupta, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 6094 (1983).
5.P. W. Bridgman, Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 47, 321 (1911).
6.P. W. Bridgman, Phys. Rev. 42, 858 (1932).
7.P. W. Bridgman, The Physics of High Pressure (Bell, London, 1958).
8.The work by Hauver is described in “Shock Waves” in High Pressure Physics and Chemistry, edited by R. S. Bradley, (Academic, New York, 1963), Vol. 2, p. 250.
9.P. J. A. Fuller and J. H. Price, Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 15, 751 (1964).
10.D. Bernstein and D. D. Keough, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 1371 (1964).
11.D. D. Keough, “Pressure for Fabrication and Operation of Manganin Shock Pressure Gages,” Final Report, Contract AF29 (601)‐68‐C‐0038, Technical Report No. AFWL‐TR‐68‐57, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (August, 1968) (unpublished).
12.J. W. Lyle, R. L. Schreiver, and A. R. McMillan, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 4663 (1969).
13.D. D. Keough and J. Y. Wong, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 3508 (1970).
14.E. Barsis, E. Williams, and C. Skoog, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 5155 (1970).
15.L. M. Lee, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 4017 (1973).
16.D. D. Keough, “Development of a High‐Sensitivity Piezoresistive Stress Transducer for the Low Kilobar Range,” Final Report, Contract No. DASA01‐69‐C‐0014, Stanford Research Institute International, Menlo Park, California (1970) (unpublished).
17.M. J. Ginsberg, D. E. Grady, P. S. DeCarli, and J. T. Rosenberg, “Effects of Stress on the Electrical Resistance of Ytterbium and Calibration of Ytterbium Stress Transducers,” Final Report, Contract DNA001‐72‐C‐0146, Stanford Research Institute International, Menlo Park, California (1973) (unpublished).
18.J. T. Rosenberg, “Development of a Piezoresistant Transducer to Measure Stress‐Time Output of Small Detonators,” AD‐912487L, Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey (1973) (unpublished).
19.J. A. Charest, “Development of a Strain‐Compensated Shock Pressure Gauge,” Report submitted by Dynasen, Inc., to Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Goleta, California (1979) (unpublished).
20.C. S. Smith, Phys. Rev. 94, 42 (1954).
21.J. T. Rosenberg and M. J. Ginsberg, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. Ser. II 17, 1099 (1972).
22.D. E. Grady and M. J. Ginsberg, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 2179 (1977).
23.D. J. Steinberg and D. L. Banner, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 235 (1979).
24.H. C. Vantine, L. M. Erickson, and J. A. Janzen, J. Appl. Phys. 51, 1957 (1980).
25.Table 5 in Ref. 1, cited above, lists many of the configurations used in existing studies.
26.W. P. Mason, Crystal Physics of Interaction Processes (Academic, New York, 1966), Chap. 10.
27.We are currently developing experimental methods to measure η.
28.B. J. Gilman and W. G. Johnston, in Solid State Physics (Academic, New York, 1962), Vol. 13.
29.F. D. Murnaghan, Finite Deformation of an Elastic Solid (Dover, New York, 1967), Chap. 4.
30.Y. C. Fung, Foundations of Solid Mechanics (Prentice‐Hall, New Jersey, 1965).
31.J. D. Eshelby, Proc. R. Soc. London A 241, 376 (1957).
32.Y. M. Gupta, D. D. Keough, D. Henley, and D. F. Walter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 395 (1980).
33.Y. M. Gupta, J. Appl. Phys. 51, 5352 (1980).
34.Dr. L. E. Schwer of SRI International performed a finite‐element calculation comparing the result for an elliptic and rectangular cross section. The answers were very similar (unpublished).
35.L. M. Barker and R. E. Hollenbach, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 4208 (1970).
36.This is because in a shock wave experiment, the loading path does not coincide with the locus of end states achieved in experiments conducted at different peak strain values.
37.Because the matrix is elastic, far away from the inclusion the stresses and strains will approach zero values.
38.D. Bernstein, C. Godfrey, A. Klein, and W. Shimmin, in Behavior of Dense Media Under High Dynamic Pressures (Gorden and Breach, New York, 1968), p. 461.
39.T. F. Stubbs, K. D. Seifert, and R. P. Swift, “Direct Observation of Transverse Stresses: The Tangential Stress Gage,” Final Report of Advanced Research Projects Agency under Contract No. H0220014, Physics International Company, San Leandro, California (1973) (unpublished).
40.G. I. Kanel, A. M. Molodets, and A. N. Dremin, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 13, 772 (1978);
40.translated fromG. I. Kanel, A. M. Molodets, and A. N. Dremin, Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva, 13, 906 (1977).
41.P. F. Chartagnac, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 948 (1982).
Article metrics loading...