1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
10Modeling of cantilever deflection for sensors and actuators: Role of Poisson’s ratio for a unified theory
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.1829378
/content/aip/journal/jap/97/10/10.1063/1.1829378
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/97/10/10.1063/1.1829378
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Geometry and coordinate axes for the bimorph cantilever: is the sample length, its width, while and are the thicknesses of the two layers. The origin of the coordinate axes is assumed to the interface.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Dependence of the ratio on Poisson’s ratio of the substrate, , for the case of the system considered in Ref. 35 (a), and for the one considered in Ref. 19 (b).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Dependence of the ratio on Poisson’s ratio of the substrate, , for different film thickness : (a) , (b) , and (c) , in the case of , , , and values considered in Ref. 35.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Dependence of the ratio on Poisson’s ratio of the substrate, , for different film thickness : (a) , (b) , and (c) , in the case of , , , and values considered in Ref. 19.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Dependence of the neutral planes position (straight) and (dashed) on the components thickness ratio for constant. The used values of Young’s moduli , , and Poisson’s ratios , of the components and , respectively, are: , , , (see Ref. 35) (a); , , , (see Ref. 19) (b); , , , (c) and , , , (d).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Dependence of the neutral planes position (straight) and (dashed) on the component thickness for a fixed total thickness of the cantilever . Young’s moduli , and Poisson’s ratios , of the components and , respectively, are: , , , (see Ref. 35) (a); , , , (see Ref. 19) (b); , , , (c); and , , , (d).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Comparison between the deflection in absolute value, , behavior as deduced from Ref. 30 (dashed) and as obtained from Eq. (27) (straight) versus the components thickness ratio for constant. The , , , , , , and values are those of Ref. 29.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/97/10/10.1063/1.1829378
2005-05-16
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: 10Modeling of cantilever deflection for sensors and actuators: Role of Poisson’s ratio for a unified theory
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/97/10/10.1063/1.1829378
10.1063/1.1829378
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM