1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
On the quality of molecular-beam epitaxy grown and interfaces
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2165914
/content/aip/journal/jap/99/8/10.1063/1.2165914
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/99/8/10.1063/1.2165914
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) AES spectrum obtained on a C-contaminated Fe surface (top) and a clean Fe surface (bottom) and corresponding RHEED patterns along the [11] azimuth of the square lattice of Fe. Additional streaks for the C-contaminated Fe surface corresponding to a reconstruction are observed. (b) Arbitrary adsorbed quantity as a function of exposure time for a C-contaminated Fe surface (open circles) and for a clean Fe surface (full squares).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Left: XPS spectra performed at room temperature on (a) a -thick reference Fe layer, (b) bare Fe monolayer, and (c) same sample than (b) but covered with 2 ML of MgO. See text for details. Right: absorption and XMCD spectra performed at room temperature on at the Fe edges. Note that all Fe surfaces of these samples are initially free of C or O contamination.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Bias variation of the TMR. Inset: typical TMR vs field loop measured at room temperature and for (a) a clean interface and (b) a interface. See text for details.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/99/8/10.1063/1.2165914
2006-04-20
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: On the quality of molecular-beam epitaxy grown Fe∕MgO and Co∕MgO(001) interfaces
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/99/8/10.1063/1.2165914
10.1063/1.2165914
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM