Kinetics at the collapse transition of homopolymers and random copolymers
1.M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Oxford Science, New York, 1989).
2.P. G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell U.P., Ithaca, NY, 1988), 3rd printing.
3.J. des Cloizeaux and G. Jannink, Polymers in Solution (Clarendon, Ox ford, 1990).
4.B. Ostrovsky and Y. Bar-Yam, Comp. Polym. Sci. 3, 9 (1993).
5.A. Byrne, P. Kiernan, D. Green, and K. A. Dawson, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 573 (1995).
6.Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, edited by K. Binder (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986), 2nd ed.;
6.Applications of Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics, edited by K. Binder (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987), 2nd ed.;
6.M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulations of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987);
6.H. P. Witmann and K. Kremer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 61, 309 (1990);
6.M. A. Smith, Y. Bar-Yam, Y. Rabin, B. Ostrovski, C. A. Bennett, N. Margolus, and T. Toffoli, Computat. Polym. Sci. 2, 165 (1992).
7.D. J. Flory, Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules (Wiley, New York 1979).
8.M. A. Smith, Y. Bar-Yam, B. Ostrovsky, Y. Rabin, C. H. Bennett, and T. Toffoli, J. Comp. Pol. Sci. 2, 165 (1992);
8.Y. Bar-Yam, Y. Rabin, and M. A. Smith, Macromol. Reprints 25, 2985 (1992).
9.In practice, we increase the lattice in each direction by the number of cells equal to the interaction range and forbid monomers to occupy those positions.
10.E. G. Timoshenko and K. A. Dawson, Phys. Rev. E 51, 492 (1995).
11.E. G. Timoshenko, Yu. A. Kuznetsov, and K. A. Dawson, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 1816 (1995).
12.By mean-field we mean, of course, Flory theory. In some sense there has never been a true mean field theory of polymer, according to the normal standards of statistical mechanics.
13.Roughly speaking, we expect the equilibration time to scale Therefore, we always equilibrate each sample for a small multiple of this fundamental relaxation time, until the averages are stable. The collapsed averages are obtained by slow annealing, with this relaxation procedure being applied at each step. A number of separate anneals are made until the final averages are stable. We note that the results in Table I are therefore obtained from many millions of MCSs, considerably more that those of Fig. 9.
14.E. G. Timoshenko, Yu. A. Kuznetsov, and K. A. Dawson, Phys. Rev. E (submitted).
15.K. A. Dawson, E. G. Timoshenko, and P. Kiernan, Proceedings of the First International Conference on “Scaling Concepts and Complex Fluids,” Catanzaro, 4–8 July, 1994, in Nuovo Cimento 16D(7) (1994);
15.K. A. Dawson, E. G. Timoshenko, and P. Kiernan (unpublished).
16.D. Bratko and K. A. Dawson, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 5352 (1993).
17.P. G. de Gennes, J. Phys. Lett. 46, L639 (1985).
18.At this point we note, though we have suppressed details, considerable effort has been extended to establish results with good statistical accuracy. In some cases the errors are given explicitly. In others the accuracy is implied by the precision of the result. We note that the status of the present results is, in these respects, quite different from an earlier work (Ref. 5) of ours, where the complexity of the model did not permit such rigor.
19.We caution the reader that, though we are confident of the exponent, we can argue for more than one origin of the result. For example, “local mobility” arguments may also give We believe that we have a theory for however, as Eq. (14) discussed above.
20.By sufficiently large q we mean large compared to the characteristic unstable mode, but smaller than the microscopic cutoff or lattice spacing.
21.E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, Physical Kinetics (Pergamon, New York, 1981), p. 427.
22.We note, from Table III that considerable care must be taken to obtain the coarsening exponent since it is only at the longest chain length that we find limiting behavior. Thus, extrapolation in N is necessary, and one should doubt estimates that preclude this possibility.
23.A. Grosberg and S. Nechaev, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 254659 (1992);
23.A.Yu. Grosberg and D. V. Kuznetsov, Macromolecules 26, 4249 (1993);
23.E. Shakhnovich and A. Gutin, Nature (London) 346, 773 (1990).
24.H. A. Scheraga, Pure Appl. Chem. 36, 1 (1973);
24.N. Go and H. Taketomi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 559 (1978);
24.O. Ptitsyn and A. Finkelstein, Q. Rev. Biophys. 13, 339 (1980);
24.P. Privalov, Adv. Protein Chem. 35, 1 (1982);
24.J. Bryngelson and P. Wolynes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7524 (1987);
24.O. Ptitsyn, J. Protein Chem. 6, 273 (1987)
24.T. Garel and H. Orland, Europhys. Lett. 6, 307 (1988);
24.H. Frauenfelder, F. Parak, and R. Young, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17, 451 (1988);
24.E. Shakhnovich and A. Gutin, Nature (London) 346, 773 (1990);
24.E. Shakhnovich, G. Farztdinov, A. M. Gutin, and M. Karplus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1665 (1991);
24.M. Matsumoto et al., J. Polym. Science B 30, 779 (1992);
24.Protein Folding, edited by T. E. Creighton (Freeman, New York, 1992);
24.K. Minagawa, Y. Matsuzawa, Y. Yoshikawa, A. R. Khokhlov, and M. Doi, Biopolymers 34, 555 (1994);
24.New Developments in Theoretical Studies of Proteins, edited by R. Elber (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
25.A. Yu. Grosberg and D. V. Kuznetsov, Macromolecules 26, 4249 (1993);
25.A. Yu. Grosberg, Y. Rabin, S. Havlin, and A. Nir, Europhys. Lett. 23, 373 (1993);
25.V. S. Pande, A. Yu. Grosberg, and T. Tanaka, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 8246 (1994).
26.C. Tanford, The Hydrophobic Effect (Wiley, New York, 1980);
26.K. A. Dill, Biochemistry 29, 7133 (1990).
27.S. P. Obukhov, J. Phys. A, 19, 3655 (1986).
28.T Garel, L. Leibler, and H. Orland, Preprint SPhT/94–077, Saclay.
29.J. D. Honeycutt and D. Thirumalai, Biopolymers, 32, 695 (1992);
29.P. E. Leopold, M. Montal, and J. Onuchic, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 9721 (1992);
29.C. J. Camacho and D. Thirumalai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 15, 2505 (1993).
30.C. D. Sfatos, A. M. Gutin, and E. I. Shakhnovich, Phys. Rev. E 50, 2898 (1994);
30.A. M. Gutin and E. I. Shakhnovich, Phys. Rev. E 50, R3322 (1994)., Phys. Rev. E
31.Y. Chang, Y. Lochhead, and C. L. McCormick, Macromolecules 27, 2145 (1994);
31.A. Gorelov and K. A. Dawson (unpublished);
31.A. du Chesne, A. Gorelov, and K. A. Dawson (unpublished).
32.C. D. Sfatos, A. M. Gutin, and E. I. Shakhnovich, Phys. Rev. E 48, 465 (1993).
33.Yu. Kuznetsov and K. A. Dawson (unpublished);
33.A. Moskalenko and K. A. Dawson (unpublished).
34.K. A. Dawson, B. L. Walker, and A. Berera, Physica A, 165, 320 (1990).
35.It can be seen from Figs. 14 and 15 that data for small concentrations are more noisy despite the fact that data for all hydrophobic concen trations were obtained from the same ensemble set.
36.A. Byrne, P. Kiernan, and K. A. Dawson (unpublished).
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month