No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
On the origin of matrix elements for electronic excitation (energy) transfer
1.Th. Förster, Ann. Phys. 2, 55 (1948);
1.Th. Förster, Z. Naturförsch A 4, 321 (1949);
1.in Modern Quantum Chemistry, edited by O. Sinanoglu (Academic, New York, 1965), Vol. 3.
2.D. L. Dexter, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 836 (1953).
3.(a) G. D. Scholes, K. P. Ghiggino, A. M. Oliver, and M. N. Paddon-Row, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 11871 (1993);
3.(b) S. Speiser, Chem. Rev. (in press).
4.G. D. Scholes and K. P. Ghiggino, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8873 (1995).
5.R. D. Harcourt, G. D. Scholes, and K. P. Ghiggino, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10521 (1994). In this reference, and in Refs. 6 and 7, the D and A chromophores were designated as A and B, respectively, and their associated orbitals as a, b, and instead of d, a, and
6.G. D. Scholes, R. D. Harcourt, and K. P. Ghiggino, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 9574 (1995).
7.G. D. Scholes and R. D. Harcourt, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 5054 (1996). In the first column of p. 5054, replace with and in the second column of p. 5059, replace with
8.D. P. Craig and T. Thirunamachandran, Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics (Academic, New York, 1984);
8.D. L. Andrews, Chem. Phys. 135, 195 (1989);
8.D. L. Andrews and G. Juzeliunas, Chem. Phys. 95, 5513 (1993); , Chem. Phys.
8.D. L. Andrews and G. Juzeliunas, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6606 (1992);
8.G. D. Scholes, A. H. A. Clayton, and K. P. Ghiggino, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 7405 (1995); , J. Phys. Chem.
8.J. Avery, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 25, 79 (1984).
9.R. D. Harcourt and W. Roso, Can. J. Chem. 56, 1093 (1978);
9.F. L. Skrezenek and R. D. Harcourt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 3934 (1984);
9.R. D. Harcourt, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 87, 1089 (1991);
9.R. D. Harcourt, 88, 1119 (1992)., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
10.In Eq. (7), the effect of configuration interaction on the donor and acceptor wave functions has been omitted. The primary effect is to scale (Ref. 7) the value of the Coulomb integral J. This scaling need not be introduced in the present treatment in order to demonstrate the origins of the nature of the interactions with which we are concerned.
11.S. Levy and S. Speiser, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 3585 (1992).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month