No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The role of asymmetric molecular bonding in adsorption dynamics: Chemisorption of on Si(111)
1.J. C. McDonald, P. R. LeBreton, Y. T. Lee, and D. R. Herschback, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 769 (1972).
2.Y. Liu, D. P. Masson, and A. C. Kummel, Science 276, 168 (1997).
3.K. H. Boswijk and E. H. Wiebenga, Acta Crystallogr. 7, 417 (1954).
4.The molecular orbital calculation was performed using a commercial program: Spartan version 4.0, Wavefunction Inc., Irvine, CA. These results were obtained from calculations at the Hartree–Fock level, but the inclusion of electron correlation does not result in significant changes. We have not considered the effects of relativity on the valence electrons, but this is also not expected to result in qualitative changes.
5.K. Takayanagi, Y. Tanishiro, M. Takahashi, and S. Takahashi, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 1502 (1985).
6.R. J. Hamers, R. M. Tromp, and J. E. Demuth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1972 (1986).
7.J. E. Demuth, B. N. J. Persson, and A. J. Schell-Sorokin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2214 (1983).
8.F. J. Himpsel and Th. Fauster, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 815 (1984).
9.Ph. Avouris and R. Wolkow, Phys. Rev. B 39, 5091 (1989).
10.J. E. Northrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 154 (1986).
11.D. Purdie, C. Muryn, N. S. Prakash, and K. G. Purccell et al., J. Phys. A 3, 7751 (1991).
12.J. J. Bolland and J. S. Villarrubia, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9865 (1990).
13.C. Yan, J. A. Jensen, and A. C. Kummel, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 3381 (1995).
14.P. W. Palmberg, G. E. Riach, R. E. Weber, and N. C. MacDonald, Handbook of Auger Electron Spectroscopy (Physical Electronics Ind., Edina, MN 1972).
15.L. E. Carter, S. Khodabanedeh, P. C. Weakliem, and E. A. Carter, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2277 (1994).
16.Y. L. Li, D. P. Pullman, J. J. Yang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2603 (1995).
17.A calculated value of has been obtained for To compute consistent energetics, the total energies of all species were calculated using the coupled-cluster method with single, double and perturbational triple excitations, CCSD(T), at geometries optimized using density functional theory, B3LYP. In all calculations the core electrons of the I and Cl atoms were described by a relativistic effective core potential [A. Nicklass, M. Dolg, H. Stoll, and H. Preuss, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 8912 (1995)]. The valence basis set for the DFT calculations is a set; for the coupled-cluster calculations this set was enlarged to
18.Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 66th ed. (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1985–1986).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month