The role of charge-transfer states of the metal-adsorbate complex in surface-enhanced Raman scattering
1.M. Moskovits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 783 (1985).
2.J. A. Creighton, “The Selection Rules for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy,” in Spectroscopy of Surfaces, edited by R. J. H. Clark and R. E. Hester (Wiley, Chichester, 1988), p. 37.
3.(a) H. Metiu, Prog. Surf. Sci. 17, 153 (1984);
3.(b) H. Metiu, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 35, 507 (1984).
4.J. R. Lombardi, R. L. Birke, T. Lu, and J. Xu, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4174 (1986), and references therein.
5.G. Zylka and A. Otto, “Search for the Dynamic Charge Transfer Excitations in Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering,” in Progress in Surface Raman Scattering, edited by Z. Q. Tian and B. Ren (Xiamen University Press, Xiamen, 2000), p. 37 and references therein.
6.See, for instance, (a) Ph. Avouris and J. E. Demuth, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 4783 (1981);
6.(b) D. Schmeisser, J. E. Demuth, and Ph. Avouris, Chem. Phys. Lett. 87, 32 (1982);
6.(c) Ph. Avuoris and J. E. Demuth, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 35, 49 (1984);
6.(d) H. Yamada, K. Toba, and Y. Nakao, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 45, 113 (1987);
6.(e) H. Yamada, H. Nagaka, K. Toba, and Y. Nakao, Surf. Sci. 182, 269 (1987);
6.(f) A. Campion, J. E. Ivanecky, C. M. Child, and M. Foster, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 11807 (1995).
7.J. F. Arenas, M. S. Woolley, I. López Tocón, J. C. Otero, and J. I. Marcos, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 7669 (2000).
8.J. C. Otero and J. I. Marcos, “Analysis of a SERS Spectrum on the Basis of a Charge Transfer Mechanism Involving Three Electronic States,” in Progress in Surface Raman Scattering, edited by Z. Q. Tian and B. Ren (Xiamen University Press, Xiamen, 2000), p. 29.
9.(a) J. F. Arenas, M. S. Woolley, J. C. Otero, and J. I. Marcos, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 3199 (1996);
9.(b) J. F. Arenas, I. López Tocón, J. C. Otero, and J. I. Marcos, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 9254 (1996);
9.(c) J. F. Arenas, I. López Tocón, M. S. Woolley, J. C. Otero, and J. I. Marcos, J. Raman Spectrosc. 29, 673 (1998);
9.(d) J. F. Arenas, I. López Tocón, J. C. Otero, and J. I. Marcos, Vib. Spectrosc. 19, 213 (1999).
10.R. J. H. Clark and T. J. Dines, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 25, 131 (1986).
11.J. I. Marcos and J. C. Otero, “Discussion on the Nature of the Charge Transfer Mechanism in SERS,” in Progress in Surface Raman Scattering, edited by Z. Q. Tian and B. Ren (Xiamen University Press, Xiamen, 2000), p. 33.
12.The electron transfer seems to follow symmetry rules for special high symmetry adsorption sites [See A. Otto, Roughness and the First Layer Electronic Enhancement of Raman Scattering, in XVIth International Conference on Raman Spectroscopy, edited by A. M. Heyns (Wiley, Chichester, 1998), p. 52 and references therein], but this subject has been not yet discussed for irregular surfaces before we did (see Refs. 7, 11).
13.For instance, the charge transfer in excited states of azoalkane-quencher systems amounts to 0.30 or less [A. Sinicropi, U. Pischel, R. Basosi, W. N. Nau, and M. Olivucci, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 39, 4582 (2000)].
14.M. Moskovits and D. P. DiLella, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 6068 (1980).
15.(a) M. Moskovits and D. P. DiLella, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 1655 (1982);
15.(b) J. K. Sass, H. Neff, M. Moskovits, and S. Holloway, J. Phys. Chem. 85, 621 (1981).
16.J. B. Foresman, M. Head-Gordon, J. A. Pople, and M. J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 135 (1992).
17.T. H. Dunning, Jr. and P. J. Hay, in Modern Theoretical Chemistry, edited by H. F. Schaefer III (Plenum, New York, 1976), p. 1.
18.(a) P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 270 (1985);
18.P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. , 82, 284 (1985);
18.P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. , 82, 299 (1985).
19.M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN 94, Revision E.2, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
20.A. Otto, I. Pockrand, J. Billmann, and C. Pettenkofer, “The Adatom Model: How Important Is Atomic Surface Roughness?” in Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering, edited by R. K. Chang and T. E. Furtak (Plenum, New York, 1982), p. 147.
21.D. Roy and T. E. Furtak, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5111 (1986).
22.S. Y. Dong, G. Wang, W. Wang, Z. Zhang, and J. Zheng, Appl. Phys. B: Photophys. Laser Chem. 49, 553 (1989).
23.A. G. Brolo and D. E. Irish, Z. Naturforsch. 50, 274 (1995).
24.See, for instance, F. Remacle and R. D. Levine, ChemPhysChem 2, 20 (2001).
25.See EPAPS Document No. for one figure and five tables. This document may be retrieved via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html) or from ftp.aip.org in the directory /epaps/. See the EPAPS homepage for more information.[Supplementary Material]
26.W. L. Peticolas, D. P. Strommen, and V. Lakshminarayanan, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 4185 (1980), and references therein.
27.F. Duschinski, Acta Physicochim. 81, 551 (1937).
28.The behavior of the CT states in Fig. 3 looks very similar to that qualitatively reported in p. 408 of J. W. Gadzuk, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 39, 395 (1988).
29.(a) The forbidden character of the transition is responsible for the weak interference effects observed in the SERS-CT excitations profiles of vibrations (Ref. 7).
29.(b) Given the small energy gap between both CT states, a Herzberg–Teller contribution as strong as the observed in the vibronic spectra of pyrazine [Y. Udagawa, M. Ito, and I. Suzuka, Chem. Phys. Lett. 60, 25 (1978)] should be expected if both transitions were dipole allowed.
29.For instance, this contribution dominate the RR spectrum of pyrazine in near-resonance with the state [I. Suzuka, Y. Udagawa, and M. Ito, Chem. Phys. Lett. 64, 333 (1979)].
30.I. López Tocón, S. P. Centeno, J. C. Otero, and J. I. Marcos, J. Mol. Struct. 565/566, 369 (2001).
31.M. Desouter-Lecomte, C. Galloy, J. C. Lorquet, and M. Vaz Pires, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 3661 (1979).
32.The calculated frequencies of mode in the and states are 1681, 1119, and 2783 cm−1, respectively (Ref. 7).
33.A pictorial plot of the normal modes of pyrazine can be seen in D. B. McDonald and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 4893 (1981).
34.(a) P. K. K. Pandey and G. C. Schatz, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 2959 (1984);
34.(b) H. Nakai and H. Nakajsuji, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 2286 (1995);
34.(c) Y. J. Kwon, D. H. Son, S. J. Ahn, M. S. Kim, and K. Kim, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 8481 (1994).
35.CIS/3-21G calculations show a very similar behavior. The calculated energies of the state of pyrazine and pyridine are 4.81 eV and 5.35 eV, respectively.
36.L. Zhu and P. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 2322 (1993).
37.Y. Mochizuki, K. Kaya, and M. Ito, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 4163 (1976).
38.T. L. Haslett, L. Tay, and M. Moskovits, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 1641 (2000).
39.(a) K. Kneipp, Y. Wang, H. Kneipp, I. Itzkan, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2444 (1996);
39.(b) K. Kneipp, H. Kneipp, I. Itzkan, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld, Chem. Phys. 247, 155 (1999).
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month