Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/jcp/118/15/10.1063/1.1561434
1.
1.J. Franck and E. Rabinowitsch, Trans. Faraday Soc. 30, 120 (1934).
2.
2.C. Lienau and A. H. Zewail, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 18629 (1996), and references therein.
3.
3.A. Materny, C. Lienau, and A. H. Zewail, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 18650 (1996), and see the most recent Ref. 4.
4.
4.J. Larsen, D. Madsen, J.-A. Poulsen, T. D. Poulsen, S. R. Keiding, and J. Thøgersen, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7997 (2002).
5.
5.M. L. Alexander, N. E. Levinger, M. A. Johnson, D. Ray, and W. C. Lineberger, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 6200 (1988).
6.
6.J. M. Papanikolas, J. R. Gord, N. E. Levinger, D. Ray, V. Vorsa, and W. C. Lineberger, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 8028 (1991).
7.
7.B. J. Greenblatt, M. T. Zanni, and D. M. Neumark, Science 276, 1675 (1997).
8.
8.B. J. Greenblatt, M. T. Zanni, and D. M. Neumark, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10566 (1999).
9.
9.B. J. Greenblatt, M. T. Zanni, and D. M. Neumark, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 601 (2000).
10.
10.A. Sanov, T. Sanford, S. Nandi, and W. C. Lineberger, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 664 (1999).
11.
11.F. G. Amar and L. Perera, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters 20, 173 (1991).
12.
12.V. S. Batista and D. F. Coker, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 7102 (1997).
13.
13.R. Parson, J. Faeder, and N. Delaney, J. Phys. Chem. 104, 9653 (2000).
14.
14.J. Ka and S. Shin, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 10087 (1998).
15.
15.Q. Liu, J.-K. Wang, and A. H. Zewail, Nature (London) 364, 427 (1993).
16.
16.J.-K. Wang, Q. Liu, and A. H. Zewail, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 11309 (1995).
17.
17.Q. Liu, J.-K. Wang, and A. H. Zewail, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 11321 (1995).
18.
18.D. H. Paik, N. J. Kim, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 6923 (2002).
19.
19.D. H. Paik, T. M. Bernhardt, N. J. Kim, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 612 (2001).
20.
20.M. J. DeLuca, C.-C. Han, and M. A. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 268 (1990).
21.
21.R. N. Barnett, U. Landman, C. L. Cleveland, and J. Jortner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 145, 382 (1988).
22.
22.M. J. DeLuca, B. Niu, and M. A. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 5857 (1988).
23.
23.K. Hiraoka, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 3190 (1988).
24.
24.The fragments and as well as and were observed in the dissociation of parent
25.
25.L. A. Posey and M. A. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 5383 (1988).
26.
26.K. Ohta and K. Morokuma, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 401 (1987).
27.
27.P. Y. Cheng, D. Zhong, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 6216 (1996).
28.
28.S. T. Arnold, J. H. Hendricks, and K. H. Bowen, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 39 (1995).
29.
29.J. Jortner, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters 24, 247 (1992).
30.
30.CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 82nd ed., edited by D. R. Lide (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2001), pp. 6–139, 6–152.
31.
31.C. Wan, T. Fiebig, O. Schiemann, J. K. Barton, and A. H. Zewail, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 14052 (2000).
32.
32.A. Ponce, H. B. Gray, and J. R. Winkler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 8187 (2000).
33.
33.N. E. Miller, M. C. Wander, and R. J. Cave, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 1084 (1999).
34.
34.A. Garcı́a-Vela, P. Villarreal, and G. Delgado-Barrio, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 7868 (1991).
35.
35.M. Gutmann, D. M. Willberg, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 8048 (1992).
36.
36.S. Fernandez Alberti, N. Halberstadt, J. A. Beswick, A. Bastida, J. Zúñiga, and A. Requena, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 239 (1999).
37.
37.D. M. Willberg, M. Gutmann, J. J. Breen, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 198 (1992).
38.
38.B. Miguel, A. Bastida, J. Zúñiga, A. Requena, and N. Halberstadt, Faraday Discuss. 118, 257 (2001).
39.
39.P. J. Robinson and K. A. Holbrook, Unimolecular Reactions (Wiley, New York, 1972).
40.
40.M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN 98, Revision A.9, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
41.
41.J. Faeder and R. Parson, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 3909 (1998).
42.
42.The difference in the asymptotes at a 400 ps time delay [1.47 eV for 1.52 eV for and 1.61 eV for could be due to the degree of vibrational relaxation in different-sized clusters. However, considering the time constants for vibrational relaxation by solvent molecules (3–12 ps) and also the number of vibrational modes in an incomplete vibrational relaxation of at 400 ps is unlikely. We suggest that the difference is due to the different contribution of the recombined product. It should be noted that the photoelectron spectrum of fragment anions is the sum of a nascent fragment from the dissociation and the from the recombination, each with a different VDE value. The increased production of recombined in larger clusters makes the asymptote value shifts toward higher EBE.
43.
43.V. Vorsa, S. Nandi, P. J. Campagnola, M. Larsson, and W. C. Lineberger, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1402 (1997).
44.
44.J. A. Kelley, W. H. Robertson, and M. A. Johnson, Chem. Phys. Lett. 362, 255 (2002).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/118/15/10.1063/1.1561434
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jcp/118/15/10.1063/1.1561434
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/118/15/10.1063/1.1561434
2003-03-31
2016-09-28
Loading

Full text loading...

true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=jcp.aip.org/118/15/10.1063/1.1561434&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jcp/118/15/10.1063/1.1561434'
Right1,Right2,Right3,