No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Entanglement-assisted coherent control in nonreactive diatom–diatom scattering
1.M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 42, 287 (2000);
1.M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Wiley, New York, in press).
2.S. A. Rice and M. Zhao, Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics (Wiley, New York, 2000).
3.H. Rabitz, R. de Vivie-Riedle, M. Motzkus, and K. Kompa, Science 288, 824 (2000).
4.V. Sanchez-Villicana, S. D. Gensemer, K. Y. N. Tan, A. Kumarakrishnan, T. P. Dinneen, W. Suptitz, and P. L. Gould, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4619 (1995).
5.P. O. Fedichev, Y. Kagan, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. T. M. Walraven, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2913 (1996).
6.M. Marinescu and L. You, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4596 (1998).
7.M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2574 (1996).
8.M. Shapiro and Y. Zeiri, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6449 (1986);
8.T. Seideman and M. Shapiro, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 7910 (1991);
8.A. Vardi and M. Shapiro, Comments At. Mol. Phys. 2, D233 (2001).
9.A. Abrashkevich, M. Shapiro, and P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3789 (1998);
9.A. Abrashkevich, M. Shapiro, and P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. Lett. erratum, 82, 3002 (1999);
9.A. Abrashkevich, M. Shapiro, and P. Brumer, Faraday Discuss. 113, 291 (1999);
9.E. Frishman, M. Shapiro, and P. Brumer, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 10333 (1999);
9.A. Abrashkevich, M. Shapiro, and P. Brumer, Chem. Phys. 267, 81 (2001).
10.P. Brumer, K. Bergmann, and M. Shapiro, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 2053 (2000).
11.M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
12.C. H. Bennett, G. Basare, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
13.For a recent teleportation scenario based on entanglement in molecular dissociation and collisions, see T. Opatrny and G. Kurizki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3180 (2000).
14.G. Ghirardi, L. Marinatto, and T. Weber, J. Stat. Phys. 108, 49 (2002).
15.J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory (Wiley, New York, 1972).
16.S. Green, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 2271 (1975).
17.T. G. Heil, S. Green, and D. J. Kouri, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 2562 (1978).
18.B. A. Robson, The Theory of Polarization Phenomena (Clarendon, Oxford, 1974).
19.To prove the equivalence between Eqs. (22) and (18), one needs to use the fact that due to parity conservation, the T-matrix elements are nonzero only if
20.J. M. Hutson and S. Green, MOLSCAT computer code, version 14 (1994), distributed by Collaborative Computational Project No. 6 of the Engineering and Physical Research Council (UK).
21.G. Zarur and H. Rabitz, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 2057 (1974).
22.A. Aguado, C. Suárez, and M. Paniagua, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4004 (1994).
23.V. Zeman, University of Toronto (private communication).
24.N. Balakrishnan, R. C. Forrey, and A. Dalgarno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3224 (1998);
24.R. C. Forrey, N. Balakrishnan, A. Dalgarno, M. R. Haggerty, and E. J. Heller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2657 (1999);
24.E. Bodo, F. A. Gianturco, and A. Dalgarno, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 9222 (2002).
25.D. J. Heinzen, R. Wynar, P. D. Drummond, and K. V. Kheruntsyan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5029 (2000).
26.A. V. Avdeenkov and J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052703 (2001);
26.J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev. A 62, 032701 (2000);
26.A. Volpi and J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052712 (2002).
27.R. N. Zare first suggested applying phase control to ultracold collisions in Faraday Discuss. 113, 351 (1999).
28.Even in the zero collision energy limit, it is still possible that many partial waves contribute to the cross section, e.g., when the interaction potential approaches zero as (Ref. 6).
29.In the close-coupling calculations, it is found that, even though the total cross section has quickly converged, substantially increasing the cutoff value of the total angular momentum may cause some artificial oscillations in the differential cross sections for θ very close to 0 or π.
30.D. C. Clary, Chem. Phys. Lett. 74, 454 (1980);
30.R. Hernández, R. Toumi, and D. Clary, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 9544 (1995).
31.V. A. Zenevich and G. Billing, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 2401 (1999).
32.S. Skokov and J. M. Bowman, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2, 495 (2000).
33.Direct wave packet propagation is a powerful tool to extract scattering information. Wave packet propagation would be formally and easily done if the scattering eigenfunction and eigenenergy in the continuum are known. The central idea of the approach in Ref. 32 is to replace the non- scattering eigenstates by real states which can be numerically treated. To do this, the continuum is discretized in a box and real eigenstates are obtained. The wave packet evolution can then be carried out almost trivially. To avoid unphysical reflections at the grid edges, the wave packet is damped at each time step. In obtaining eigenfunctions, a potential-optimized discrete variable representation is employed, and the truncation/recoupling technique is essential for efficient calculations.
34.E. Hagley, X. Maı̂tre, G. Nogues, C. Wunderlich, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1 (1997);
34.Q. A. Turchette, C. S. Wood, B. E. King, C. J. Myatt, D. Leibfried, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3631 (1998);
34.B. Julsgaard, A. Kozhekin, and E. S. Polzik, Nature (London) 413, 400 (2001).
35.H. Pu and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3987 (2000);
35.L.-M. Duan, A. Sørensen, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3991 (2000).
36.K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1003 (1998).
37.R. G. Unanyan, M. Fleischhauer, K. Bergmann, and B. W. Shore, Opt. Commun. 155, 144 (1998);
37.H. Theuer, R. G. Unanyan, C. Habscheid, K. Klein, and K. Bergmann, Opt. Express 4, 77 (1999).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month