1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Contact atomic structure and electron transport through molecules
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.1851496
/content/aip/journal/jcp/122/7/10.1063/1.1851496
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/122/7/10.1063/1.1851496

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Optimized atomic structures of the LML systems investigated, obtained by relaxing fully the molecule, the first two atomic layers of the two lead surfaces, and the molecule-lead separation. (a), (b), and (c): The Au leads are in the (001) direction, and there are 0, 2, and 1 additional Au atoms at the contacts, respectively. (d), (e), and (f): The Au leads are in (111) direction, and there are 0, 2, and 1 additional Au atoms at the contacts, respectively. The dashed line indicates the interface between the device region and the left or right lead ( or ). The in-plane adsorption site of the molecule is indicated by a dark-colored ball in (g) for (001) and in (h) for (111).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Comparison between the transmission functions of the unrelaxed (dashed line) and the relaxed (solid line) systems. Different systems are indicated by their structure labels as defined in the text. (a), (b), (c), and (d) correspond to the atomic structures of (a), (b), (d), (e) in Fig. 1, respectively.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Local density of states within the energy window around the Fermi energy for the systems (001)̱0Au (upper) and (001)̱2Au (lower). Note the channel with LUMO-like character in the latter which is absent in the former.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Equilibrium conductance and lead-to-molecule electron transfer as functions of the change in Au–S distance , for (a) unrelaxed (001)̱2Au system, (b) unrelaxed (001)̱0Au system, and (c) relaxed (001)̱1Au system. In (a) and (b) of the two contacts is rigidly and symmetrically changed, while in (c) only of the contact without the additional Au is rigidly changed. The transmission function for point is shown in (d), while those for points and are already shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(a), respectively. Note the large resonance conductance peak in panels (a)–(c) accompanied by significant electron transfer to the molecule. The similarity of (d) to Fig. 2(b) shows that increased Au–S separation has an effect comparable to that of the extra Au atoms.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Contour plots of transmission as a function of both energy and for (a) unrelaxed (001)̱2Au system, (b) unrelaxed (001)̱0Au system, and (c) relaxed (001)̱1Au system. The meaning of is the same as in Fig. 4. The contributions from the HOMO and LUMO orbitals of the isolated molecule are indicated in (a) and (b).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

curve of the smaller (001)̱2Au system shown in the upper inset, whose transmission function under zero bias is shown in the lower inset. Note that there is a large resonance peak in around the Fermi energy which causes a large negative differential conductance in the curve around .

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Calculated equilibrium conductance (, in units of ) and molecule-lead electron transfer (, in units of electron, a positive value means that electrons are transferred from lead to molecule). Note the large effect of adding additional Au atoms.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Equilibrium conductance (in units of ) calculated by using the wider leads and the smaller basis set as mentioned in the text. For a consistent comparison, we also list the results from the small-bais-set calculation for the small leads. Note the same effect of adding additional Au atoms, as shown in Table I.

Generic image for table
Table III.

Calculated equilibrium conductance (, in units of ) and molecule-lead electron transfer (, in units of electron) for the Se- and Te-anchored systems. (The notations are the same as those in Table I). All the trends seen in the S anchored systems are also evident here.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/122/7/10.1063/1.1851496
2005-02-11
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Contact atomic structure and electron transport through molecules
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/122/7/10.1063/1.1851496
10.1063/1.1851496
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM