banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Periodic orientational motions of rigid liquid-crystalline polymers in shear flow
Rent this article for
View: Figures


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Snapshots of the normalized end-to-end vectors of rigid rods in shear flow, plotted as dots on the surface of a unit sphere. The flow direction, which is also the initial orientation of every rod, runs from the left pole to the right pole. Drawn lines represent meridians and parallels. A tumbling/kayaking motion is represented by the snapshots A to F, which are not evenly spaced in time. The simulation box contains 1750 rods with aspect ratio , at a scaled volume fraction of 3.5 and an applied shear rate of . Note that gradually a small secondary cluster develops, diametrically opposed to the main cluster, of rods that have individually flipped from parallel to antiparallel to the director.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

The scalar order parameter (thick solid line) as well as the three components (solid), (dashed), and (dotted) of the director as functions of time. The component reveals how the motion of an initially flow-aligned system evolves from in-plane tumbling to out-of-plane kayaking.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The path traced out by the director of Fig. 2 on the surface of a unit sphere as seen along the vorticity (a) and flow (b) direction. The in-plane tumbling motion, characterized by a circle in (a) and a vertical line in (b), turns into an out-of-plane kayaking motion, illustrated by an ellipse in (a) and a >-shaped path in (b).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The scalar order parameter (solid lines) and the (dashed) and (dotted) components of the director as functions of elapsed strain. From left to right the scaled volume fractions are 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 at fixed , while from bottom to top the shear rate doubles.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The dimensionless kayaking periods for as functions of shear rate. Horizontal lines are averages over the simulations corresponding to , 4.0, and 4.5, respectively.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The dependence of the kayaking period on the aspect ratio, the scaled volume fraction, and the applied shear rate. Solid, gray, and open symbols represent , 4.0, and 4.5, respectively.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

The dimensionless kayaking period as a function of , for various aspect ratios in a range from 10 to 60. The simulation results are seen to converge with increasing to the master curve of Eq. (4), shown as a solid line.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

The correlation between rods’ end-to-end vector at time 0 and at time , in cubic simulation boxes with volumes twice (b), four times (c), and eight times (d) as large as the standard box size (a), respectively. In all four systems, , , and . For comparison reasons, the origins of time were shifted to make the first occasions of coincide (dashed line).

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

The dimensionless kayaking period as a function of the scalar order parameter . Solid squares denote the direct measurements in this work. Open circles represent calculated periods using the theory of Larson (Ref. 12), Eqs. (8)–(11), based on and from equilibrium simulations. The dashed curve shows a calculation of on the basis of alone, proposed by Hinch and Leal (Ref. 53). Experimental measurements by Lettinga et al. (Ref. 38) are expressed as stars.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Comparison of the experimental kayaking periods of the virus (Ref. 38) (stars, ) and simulation results (open symbols, ).

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

The paths traced out by the directors on unit spheres (viewed along the vorticity direction) at shear rates of 75 (a), 250 (b), and (c). and .

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

The critical rotational Peclet number of the kayaking to wagging transition as a function of aspect ratio for three scaled volume fractions. The experimental result for the virus (Ref. 38), with , is shown as a star. See the main text for a discussion of this measurement.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

The scalar order parameter and the three components of as a function of strain for wagging (left) and flow-aligning (right) motions. The paths of these directors are depicted by Figs. 11(b) and 11(c).

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

The shear-dependent average angle between the arrested director and the flow direction in the flow-aligned system, as a function of .

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

The maximum averaged flow-aligned angle as a function of , for three scaled volume fractions.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

The scalar order parameter (thick solid line) as well as the three components (solid), (dashed), and (dotted) of the director as functions of time. Nematic simulation boxes initially aligned along the flow (a) and gradient (b) direction, as well as an initially isotropic (c) box, quickly evolve a kayaking motion. The nematic box aligned along the vorticity direction (d), however, shows a log-rolling motion. In all plots, , , and .

Image of FIG. 17.
FIG. 17.

At a low shear rate of , a system initially aligned along the vorticity direction shows a log-rolling motion (a), which is stable against occasional fluctuations. At an intermediate shear rate of , the system performs a log-rolling motion at the beginning, which gives way to a wagging (b) motion, while the same system immediately progresses to a flow-aligning (c) state at the high shear rate of . , and .


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Periodic orientational motions of rigid liquid-crystalline polymers in shear flow