1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Coulomb repulsion effect in two-electron nonadiabatic tunneling through a one-level redox molecule
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3253699
/content/aip/journal/jcp/131/16/10.1063/1.3253699
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/131/16/10.1063/1.3253699
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Dependence of the tunneling current on the “overpotential” for the vacuum tunneling contact . The current is normalized to the tunneling current for infinitely large Coulomb repulsion energy at . , . Solid line: . Dashed line: . (a) . (b) .

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Dependence of the tunneling current on the overpotential. Condensed matter in situ environment. Large positive . The current is normalized to the tunneling current for infinitely large Coulomb repulsion energy at zero effective overpotential. , , and . Solid line: . Dashed line: . (a) ; (b) .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Dependence of the tunneling current on the overpotential. Either positive or negative, small . The current is normalized to where is the tunneling current for infinitely large Coulomb repulsion energy at zero value of the effective overpotential , , , . (1) . (2) . (3) . (4) .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Dependence of the tunneling current on the bias voltage for to illustrate rectification. The current is normalized to . , , and . Dotted line: . Dashed line: . Solid line: .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Dependence of the tunneling current on the bias voltage to illustrate rectification. Condensed matter environment. The current normalized to . Variable . , , and . (a) ; (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) . (b) ; (1) , (2) , (3) . (c) ; (1) , (2) , (3) .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Dependences of the tunneling current (a) and differential conductance (b) on the bias voltage for the vacuum tunneling contact at , , , , and different . The current is normalized to . Solid line: . Dashed line: .

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Effect of and on the differential conductance for the vacuum tunneling contact at and . . Solid line: , , . Dashed line: , . Dotted line: , , .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Dependences of the tunneling current (a) and differential conductance (b) on the bias voltage for the vacuum tunneling contact for and , , , , and different values of . Solid line: . Dashed line: . Dotted line: .

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Dependencies of the tunneling current (a) and differential conductance (b) on the bias voltage for the vacuum tunneling contact for , , , and . Negative . The current is normalized to . Solid line: . Dashed line: . Dotted line: .

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Dependencies of the differential conductance on the bias voltage in the infinite limit for the in situ tunneling contact for , , and . Solid line: . Dashed line: . Dotted line: .

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Dependencies of the differential conductance on the bias voltage for the in situ tunneling contact for , , and . Finite . Solid line: . Dashed line: . Dotted line: . (a) , (b) , and (c) .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/131/16/10.1063/1.3253699
2009-10-26
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Coulomb repulsion effect in two-electron nonadiabatic tunneling through a one-level redox molecule
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/131/16/10.1063/1.3253699
10.1063/1.3253699
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM