banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Conductive junctions with parallel graphene sheets
Rent this article for


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

A diagrammatic illustration of electron transport through a graphene-dithiophene-graphene junction. Both the graphene sheets extend to infinity in and directions. (a) Side view of the junction, with being the vertical separation between planar areas of two graphene layers. (b) Perspective view of the junction proximity, with the blue (red) circles representing the link (anchor) atoms of the bridging molecule (graphene).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Each row represents a GMG junction. The left panel depicts the perspective view of the optimized structure, the right panel plots the LDOS in the energy window of , and the bridging molecule is sketched in the middle. The calculated transmission coefficient per spin, , is 0.065 for (a)-(b), 0.014 for (c)-(d), 0.13 for (e)-(f), and 0.068 for (g)-(h), respectively.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Side view of the (a) ideal and (b) optimized structures of a graphene-(1,4-diethynylbenzene)-graphene junction. (c) Perspective view from a twisted angle. Note that each link atom is bonded to two adjacent anchor atoms, and forms a three-member ring at each side.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Calculated zero-bias transmission spectrum for the GMG junction displayed in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). Note the drastic reduction of near upon geometric relaxation.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

A GMG junction with a gradually titled OTP2 molecular bridge. The horizontal distance between the two anchor atoms and the vertical separation between the planar areas of graphene are (in unit of Å): (a) and , (b) and , (c) and , and (d) and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Transmission coefficient of a GMG junction of OTP2 molecular bridge as a function of . The circles represent calculated data and the connecting lines are guide to the eyes. The solid squares in inset represent the calculated second binding energy as a function of , and the red line is a linear fit.


Generic image for table
Table I.

vs the tilt angle of the OTP2 bridge in a GMG junction depicted in Fig. 4.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Conductive junctions with parallel graphene sheets