1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
f
Communications: Entanglement switch for dipole arrays
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/12/10.1063/1.3366522
1.
1.M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
2.
2.L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517
3.
3.V. Vedral, Nature (London) 453, 1004 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07124
4.
4.S. Kais, Adv. Chem. Phys. 134, 493 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470106600.ch18
5.
5.O. Osenda, Z. Huang, and S. Kais, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062321 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.67.062321
6.
6.Z. Huang, O. Osenda, and S. Kais, Phys. Lett. A 322, 137 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.01.022
7.
7.Z. Huang and S. Kais, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 3, 483 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219749905001055
8.
8.Z. Huang and S. Kais, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022339 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022339
9.
9.R. Krems, W. C. Stwalley, and B. Friedrich, Cold Molecules: Theory, Experiment, Applications (Taylor Francis, London, 2009).
10.
10.D. Herschbach, Faraday Discuss. 142, 9 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b910118g
11.
11.B. Friedrich and J. M. Doyle, ChemPhysChem 10, 604 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800577
12.
12.D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.067901
13.
13.G. K. Brennen, I. H. Deutsch, and P. S. Jessen, Phys. Rev. A 61, 062309 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062309
14.
14.G. K. Brennen, C. M. Caves, P. S. Jessen, and I. H. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1060 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1060
15.
15.A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, Nat. Phys. 2, 341 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys287
16.
16.M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037901
17.
17.D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2208
18.
18.S. F. Yelin, K. Kirby, and R. Cote, Phys. Rev. A 74, 050301(R) (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.050301
19.
19.E. Charron, P. Milman, A. Keller, and O. Atabek, Phys. Rev. A 75, 033414 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.033414
20.
20.E. Kuznetsova, R. Cote, K. Kirby, and S. F. Yelin, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012313 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012313
21.
21.Z. Ficek and S. Swain, Quantum Interference and Coherence Theory and Experiment (Springer, New York, 2004).
22.
22.W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245
23.
23.S. Hill and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5022
24.
24.E. Urban, T. A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isenhower, D. D. Yavuz, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman, Nat. Phys. 5, 110 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys1178
25.
25.T. Amthor, C. Giese, C. S. Hofmann, and M. Weidemuller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 013001 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.013001
26.
26.R. Heidemann, U. Raitzsch, V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, R. Low, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 033601 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.033601
27.
27.K. K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Pe’er, B. Neyenhuis, J. J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. S. Julienne, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Science 322, 231 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1163861
28.
28.J. Deiglmayr, A. Grochola, M. Repp, K. Mörtlbauer, C. Glück, J. Lange, O. Dulieu, R. Wester, and M. Weidermüller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 133004 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.133004
29.
29.L. D. Carr, D. DeMille, R. V. Krems and J. Ye, New J. Phys. 11, 055049 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/5/055049
30.
30.M. Aymar and O. Dulieua, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 204302 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1903944
31.
31.J. L. Bohn, e-print arXiv:0901.0276.
32.
32.D. E. Chang, J. D. Thompson, H. Park, V. Vuletić, A. S. Zibrov, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 123004 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.123004
33.
33.B. Murphy and L. V. Hau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 033003 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.033003
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/12/10.1063/1.3366522
Loading
/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/12/10.1063/1.3366522
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/12/10.1063/1.3366522
2010-03-29
2014-09-03

Abstract

We propose a new entanglement switch of qubits consisting of electric dipoles oriented along or against an external electric field and coupled by the electric dipole-dipole interaction. The pairwise entanglement can be tuned and controlled by the ratio of the Rabi frequency and the dipole-dipole coupling strength. Tuning the entanglement can be achieved for one, two, and three-dimensional arrangements of the qubits. The feasibility of building such an entanglement switch is also discussed.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/jcp/132/12/1.3366522.html;jsessionid=1sjla01h8t46h.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/12/10.1063/1.3366522&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/jcp
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Communications: Entanglement switch for dipole arrays
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/12/10.1063/1.3366522
10.1063/1.3366522
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM