1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Prewetting transitions of one site associating fluids
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3382345
/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/14/10.1063/1.3382345
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/14/10.1063/1.3382345

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic diagram of single site associating model.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

The particle number probability distributions at coexistence for a series of temperatures for an associating fluid with . Curves from bottom to top are for through in increments of 0.025.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Prewetting coexistence curves for different associating strengths. Statistical error is smaller than the symbol size.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Local density profile for coexistence thick and thin films: (a) at , (b) for . Thick films are represented by the filled symbols whereas open symbols are for thin films.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Coexistence pressure of thin-thick film of associating fluids with different associating strengths as a function of the inverse of temperature.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Monomer fraction for coexistence thin and thick films for different association strengths. Filled symbols represent the thin film and open symbols represent the thick film. Error bars are smaller than the symbol size.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Coexistence monomer fraction profile for thick and thin films of associating fluid with at different temperatures. Filled symbols represent the thick film and open symbols represent the thin film.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Orientational order profile of coexistence thin and thick films at for different association strengths. Symbols square, circle and triangle represent , 6, and 8, respectively.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Difference of bulk saturation chemical potential and prewetting chemical potential vs temperature for one site associating fluids.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Difference of bulk saturation chemical potential and prewetting chemical potential vs temperature in a scaled form as per Eq. (8).

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

System size dependence of the boundary tension for . Data points from top to bottom are from through in increments of 0.025. Lines provide an extrapolation to the infinite system size.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Infinite system size boundary tension vs temperature for various association strengths. Curves serve as a guide to the eye. The inset represents the infinite system size boundary tension vs reduced temperature for different associating strengths. Symbols square, circle, triangle, diamond and star represent boundary tension for associating strength , 4, 6, 8, and 10, respectively.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Wetting temperature, , and critical prewetting temperature, , for various association strength, . Errors associated with these temperatures are less than 1%.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/14/10.1063/1.3382345
2010-04-08
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Prewetting transitions of one site associating fluids
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/14/10.1063/1.3382345
10.1063/1.3382345
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM