1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Phase diagram of colloid-rod system
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3298993
/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/4/10.1063/1.3298993
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/4/10.1063/1.3298993

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Domains of reservoir volume fraction scaled by multiplication with (i.e., ) of colloidal rods vs colloidal hard spheres for the colloid-rod system. From top to bottom corresponds to (a) ; (b) ; (c) ; (d) ; (e) , respectively. Notations used are: gas-solid, red; fluid, black; liquid-solid, green; solid, blue; gas-liquid, yellow; kinetic phase separation region, gray. The solid triangle sits on the boundary between gas-liquid (yellow) and fluid (black). The asterisk symbol in the kinetic phase transition region is the initial volume fractions and of colloidal hard spheres and colloidal rods, respectively. In (e), the free energy density minimization yields two coexisting phases, one in the gas-liquid coexistence domain (left open circle) and another in the gas-solid coexistence domain (right open circle). The former is further phase-separated into gas-liquid (solid squares) and the latter into gas-solid (full triangles).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Same as Figs. 1(a)–1(e), but for system’s volume fraction also scaled by multiplication with . Note the triangular gas-liquid-solid area. Our free energy density minimization shows that initial concentrations of colloidal hard spheres and colloidal rods phase-separated into two sets of two phases in coexistence. Figures (a)–(e) are one-to-one correspondence to Figs. 1(a)–1(e) and should therefore be read in parallel. The orange crosses inside the triangle are the initial volume fractions used in the minimization of in Eq. (19). All of the values of yield the same vertices of the triangle (numerical details are given in Table III) but with different , (see text). The inset in (e) enlarges the region containing phase transition points.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Coexistence phase boundaries of Fig. 1(e) reproduced for the convenience of discussion. Two initial reservoir volume fractions, and (9.01, 0.2) are selected. (b) Same as (a) but for the system’s volume fraction . The two cases (solid triangle) in (a) in this plot indicate the tie lines where phase separations occur. Along and for any inside the triangular area, there is an ambiguity if one were to use tie line to recover corresponding boundary points in Fig. 3(a). Our minimization of free energy density at and for any inside the triangular area yields domain points that lie in the gray region in Fig. 1(e).

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Minimized free energy density calculated at initial volume fractions [solid triangle in Fig. 1(d)] of colloidal rods and colloidal hard spheres . The , are volume fractions of phase-separated colloids, and are their corresponding Helmholtz free energy densities and ratio of spatial volumes to total volume, respectively.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Initial volume fractions of reservoir colloidal rods at and colloidal hard spheres at . The free energy density minimization yields first the metastable liquid at coexisting with a solid at . The former subsequently phase-separates into equilibrium a gas phase at and a liquid phase at , whereas the latter phase-separates instead into equilibrium a gas phase at and a solid phase at . The variable is the ratio of the spatial volume of phase to the total volume and is the free energy density of phase.

Generic image for table
Table III.

Triangular region of three-phase coexistence bounded by gas-liquid, gas-solid, and liquid-solid for a mixture of colloidal hard spheres and colloidal hard rods. The vertices of the triangle are: gas at , liquid at , and solid at . The spatial volume is the ratio of of phase to the total volume . Minimization of [Eq. (19) in text] subject to the conservation constraints given by Eqs. (20a)–(20c) for each of the initial volume fractions yields the same vertices of the triangle, whereas for initial volumes , (0.32, 4.2089), and (0.51, 0.5854) on the sides of the triangles, we obtain the gas-liquid with , gas-solid with , and liquid-solid with , respectively.

Generic image for table
Table IV.

Comparison of the predicted rod reservoir volume fraction for an initially fixed coordinates and . Two cases are considered: one for [Fig. 1(a)] and another [Fig. 1(d)]. Both cases are set at .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/4/10.1063/1.3298993
2010-01-27
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Phase diagram of colloid-rod system
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/4/10.1063/1.3298993
10.1063/1.3298993
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM