No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Response to “Comment on ‘Comparison between solutions of the general dynamic equation and the kinetic equation for nucleation and droplet growth’ ” [J. Chem. Phys.132, 047101 (2010)]
1.V. A. Shneidman, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 047101 (2010).
3.V. A. Shneidman, personal communication (2009).
Article metrics loading...
The analytical results presented in the comment of Shneidman for the droplet size distribution, the thickness of the distribution front, and the location of the stationary source are compared to our earlier numerical results. The agreement is very good in the case of the size distribution and the source location, but the analytical result for the thickness of the front deviates from the numerical result at high supersaturations.
Full text loading...
Most read this month