1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Fluid epitaxialization effect on velocity dependence of dynamic contact angle in molecular scale
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3294879
/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/5/10.1063/1.3294879
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/5/10.1063/1.3294879

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Typical system for moving contact line problem.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Simulation system geometry. The origin of axis is at the receding contact line of fluid 2 and axis at the initial position of inner wall atoms.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Direction of wall lattice. The wall consists of two layers of bcc lattice. Larger circle: innermost layer contacting with fluid; smaller circle: outer layer.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Distribution of number density of the fluids for the stationary condition.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Distribution of particle number densities of fluid 2 in plane for the static condition. The four edges of the depicted area correspond to the position of inner atoms of the plate.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Values of the structure factor [Eq. (2)] in the first layer vs in the stationary condition.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Distribution of -component of the fluid velocity in the first layer near the receding contact line for .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Time variation of the distribution of the number density of fluid 2 in the first layer along axis for .

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Contact angle variation for the change in . Open symbols denote the steady state condition, and solid symbols denote non-steady-state condition in which a liquid film is formed behind the receding contact line of fluid 2.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Instantaneous projection of the atom positions onto plane for . The receding contact line of fluid 2 is moving to the left.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Schematic of the measurement of the force component in . Dashed lines represent the interaction between pairs.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Distribution of near the receding contact line of fluid 2.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Distribution of near the receding contact line of fluid 2 for .

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Values of in Eq. (10) for . The results are plotted based on the average of for fluid 1 and 2 in each case. Cross represents [Eq. (11)].

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

(circles with respect to left vertical axis) and (triangles with respect to right vertical axis) vs . Open and solid symbols correspond to fluids 1 and 2, respectively. (a) For the whole range in the simulation and (b) expanded plots of (a) around .

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Lattice constant and the density ration for the three cases.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/5/10.1063/1.3294879
2010-02-01
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Fluid epitaxialization effect on velocity dependence of dynamic contact angle in molecular scale
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/132/5/10.1063/1.3294879
10.1063/1.3294879
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM