1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Ab initio investigation of benzene clusters: Molecular tailoring approach
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3494536
/content/aip/journal/jcp/133/16/10.1063/1.3494536
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/133/16/10.1063/1.3494536

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Illustration of fragmentation pattern employed in MTA, taking hexamer (hex-01) as a prototypical case.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

optimized geometries of three predominant structures of benzene dimers. Important and interactions in these clusters are depicted along with distances (in angstrom) between H-atom and ring center for interaction and between two ring centers for interaction. These dimers are used as building blocks for higher clusters with three or more benzene units. Total energy of the structures (in hartree) along with complexation energies (CE in kcal/mol) for each structure is mentioned.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Numbering key for fragments used to study the effect of BSSE by MTA. Optimized geometry of tet-09 at level of theory chosen to study the effect. (b) MTA-optimized geometry of a hexamer (hex-10) chosen to study the effect of missing two- and three-body correction terms for improvement of MTA-energy estimates. The numbering key for fragments used is also indicated.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

optimized geometries of selected structures of , to 8. Important and interactions in these clusters are depicted along with distances (in angstrom) between H-atom and ring center for interaction and between two ring centers for interaction at (bold) and (italics) level. Total energy (in hartrees) of each cluster at is also indicated in italics. In case of heptamers and octamers distances in bold are those obtained at MP2/STO-3G level. tri-05 is optimized at level of theory.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(i) MESP isosurface at −0.015 a.u. for pen-18 at level plotted using METASTUDIO (Ref. 43). The white dot depicting the deepest minimum is the most suitable site for the next incoming benzene monomer. (ii) Different ways of adding a benzene (red line) to 5 benzenes (black lines) of pen-18 (A) perfect T-shaped interaction, [(B) and (C)] parallel shifted interactions, and (D) the most stable trimer formation as highlighted by a circle.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

(i) MESP isosurface at −0.015 a.u. for hex-10 evaluated at level, plotted using METASTUDIO (Ref. 43). The deepest minimum, , and other local minima depicted by white dots indicate the most suitable sites for addition of the next benzene moiety. (ii) Different possible ways of adding new benzene (shown by red line) to hex-18 (black lines): (A) a perfect T-shaped interaction, [(B) and (C)] parallel shifted interactions, and [(D) and (E)] most stable trimer formation as highlighted by circles.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Actual total energies ( in a.u.) with corresponding complexation energies (CE in kcal/mol) at , MP2/STO-3G levels of theory, and MTA-based estimates of energy ( in a.u.) with corresponding complexation energies ( in kcal/mol) at level of theory for selected important benzene clusters . Optimization of dimers and trimers are done only at level of theory. See Figs. 2 and 4 for optimized geometries and text for details.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Actual total energies, MTA-based single point energies, and MTA-based optimized energies (, , and in a.u.) with corresponding complexation energies (CE, and in kcal/mol) at the level of theory for benzene tetramers shown below.

Generic image for table
Table III.

MTA-optimized energies, actual single point energy from calculation on MTA-optimized geometries (, in a.u.), and their corresponding complexation energies (, in kcal/mol) at for benzene tetramers . BSSE-corrected complexation energy is indicated as .

Generic image for table
Table IV.

Comparison of CE and complexation energy per interaction for optimized clusters at and level (MTA-optimized) to assess cooperativity. denotes the number of interactions present in the type of cluster. PD indicates parallel displaced clusters. See Fig. 2 and 4 for optimized structures and text for details.

Generic image for table
Table V.

Missing two- and three-body correction to the MTA-based energy estimate for hex-10 [cf. Figs. 3(b) and 4 for structure]. and denote MTA-energy before and after missing two- and three-body contributions are added. All the energies are in a.u. See text for details.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/133/16/10.1063/1.3494536
2010-10-25
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Ab initio investigation of benzene clusters: Molecular tailoring approach
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/133/16/10.1063/1.3494536
10.1063/1.3494536
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM