1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Theory of nanoparticle diffusion in unentangled and entangled polymer melts
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3664863
/content/aip/journal/jcp/135/22/10.1063/1.3664863
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/135/22/10.1063/1.3664863
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

An example of the amplitude of the unentangled friction contribution (solid, left axis) and the entangled friction contribution (dashed, right axis) as a function of wavevector for parameters relevant to nanoparticles in polystyrene5 (see text), a continuum athermal liquid structure, and R = 3 nm. (Inset) The k-space entanglement friction contribution defined in Eq. (16b). Here, S 0 = 0.25, and calculations for a tube diameter (in nm) of 9 (dashed-dotted), 8 (dotted), 7 (dashed), and 6 (solid) are shown.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Stokes-Einstein violation ratio as a function of degree of entanglement as computed from Eq. (22) for (top to bottom): R/d T = 0.25 (solid), 0.5 (dashed), 1 (dashed-dotted), 4 (dashed-dotted-dotted), 16 (short dashed), 64 (short dashed-dotted), at fixed S 0 = 0.25. The values of R/d T need to be interpreted in terms of R g in the unentangled regime (n ≪ 1).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Stokes-Einstein violation ratio as a function of R/d T for entangled melts with (bottom to top): n = 1 (solid), 2 (dashed), 4 (dashed-dotted), 8 (dashed-dotted-dotted), 16 (short dashed). S 0 = 0.25 in all cases. Lines of slope –2 and –5 are indicated for reference. (Inset) Same as main frame for different values of S 0 = 0.10 (solid), 0.25(dashed), and 0.40 (dashed-dotted) at fixed n = 16 which is representative of the limiting heavily entangled behavior.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The nanoparticle-polymer site-site pair correlation function with R = 3 nm and ε = 0 (solid), 1 (dashed), 2 (dotted), and 0 (dashed-dotted). The polymer melt packing fraction is η t = 0.40 for all cases except for the dashed-dotted curve for which η t = 0.35. (Inset) Fourier-transformed total correlation function, , obtained from PRISM theory for R = 3 nm and ɛ = 0 (solid), 1 (dashed), 2 (dotted), 3 (dashed-dotted), 4 (dashed-dotted-dotted), with η t = 0.40. The inset shows the surface excess as a function of interfacial attraction strength for R = 3 nm (solid) and 6 nm (dashed) at η t = 0.40.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Stokes-Einstein violation ratio calculated using PRISM structural input at η t = 0.40 (solid) and 0.35 (dashed-dotted), with n = 12 and d T = 8 nm. Analogous D/D SE (dashed and dashed-dotted-dotted) calculations using the athermal continuum structure model with distance of closest approach modified from R to R + d/2 and S 0 = are also shown. A line of slope of –3.5 is indicated which matches rather well our calculations at lower R, though this an apparent power law indicative of a crossover regime. (Inset) The same plot for an unentangled case (n = 1/4).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Experimental5 (squares) and theoretical values of D/D SE. In the theory, the polystyrene (PS) experimental values of d T = 8 nm, n = 12, and S 0 are employed. Calculations for R = 3 nm (dashed) and 3.5 nm (dotted) are reasonably lower and an upper estimates of the effective radius of the CdSe nanoparticles in PS melts. (Inset) The same experimental data (squares) plotted as a function of with a linear fit; S 0 is determined from T based on Eq. (21).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Stokes-Einstein violation ratio as a function of polymer-particle attraction strength ε, with R = 3 nm,d T = 8 nm, and η t = 0.40 at (bottom to top): n = 1/4 (solid), 1 (dashed), 4 (dotted), 16 (dashed-dotted), and 100 (dashed-dotted-dotted).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

The amplitude of the unentangled friction of Eq. (16a) for R = 3 nm, η t = 0.40 and (top to bottom at low k): ε = 0 (solid), 1 (dashed), 2 (dotted), 3 (dashed-dotted), 4 (dashed-dotted-dotted). (Inset) The amplitude of the entanglement friction, , for the same parameter set and labeling scheme.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Stokes-Einstein violation ratio as a function of attraction strength at fixed n = 12, d T = 8 nm, η t = 0.40 and various nanoparticle radii in nm (top to bottom): R = 2 (solid), 3 (dashed), 4 (dotted), 5 (dashed-dotted), and 6 (dashed-dotted-dotted).

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Wavevector-resolved entanglement friction contribution of Eq. (16b) for d T = 8 nm and S 0 = 0.25 for (top to bottom): ε = 0 (solid), 1 (dashed), 2 (dotted), 3 (dashed-dotted), 4 (dashed-dotted-dotted). Note that k cut ≃ 0.4 nm−1. (Inset) The same plot with d T = 3 nm.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jcp/135/22/10.1063/1.3664863
2011-12-09
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Theory of nanoparticle diffusion in unentangled and entangled polymer melts
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jcp/135/22/10.1063/1.3664863
10.1063/1.3664863
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM