banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Electric field inside a “Rossky cavity” in uniformly polarized water
Rent this article for
View: Figures


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Cartoon of the charge distribution σ P at the surface of a spherical cavity carved from a liquid dielectric. Panel (a) represents the picture of standard Maxwell's electrostatics of dielectrics, when the normal projection of the dipolar polarization along the external field creates the positive and negative lobes of the surface charge distribution. Those result from the mathematical surface cutting through polarized dipoles of the liquid shown by arrows. The overall electric field inside the cavity is then reduced from the external field by the opposing field of the surface charges [Eq. (1)]. Panel (b) shows the scenario suggested by the orientational dipolar order at the surface of a “Rossky cavity” in a polar liquid (Refs. 6–12). In-plane orientations of the surface dipoles, unaltered by a weak external field, do not produce surface charge. The result is zero surface charge density σ P and the field at the cavity center following the Lorentz equation [Eq. (2)].

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

A cartoon of the Kihara solute in SPC/E water and the definition of the projection angles describing the orientations of waters in the first hydration layer in respect to the surface normal . θ b is the angle between O–H bond and , θ m is the angle between the water dipole and , θ defines the orientation of the plane of H2O (note that ).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The cavity field inside Kihara solutes (filled points, connected by the dashed lines) compared to hard-sphere cavities inside dipolar fluids (open points, connected by the dash-dotted lines) (Ref. 14). Results of MD simulations in the main panel refer to two values of the solute-solvent LJ attraction, ε0s = 0.65 kJ/mol (circles) and 20.0 kJ/mol (squares). The results for the Kihara solutes are plotted against the radius of closest approach R 0s s defined by Eq. (4) (σ s = 2.87 Å). Open points in the main panel and the inset refer to sets of data obtained for varied reduced dipole moment of the dipolar hard-sphere fluids: 0.5 (diamonds), 1.0 (triangles), and 3.0 (squares). The results for hard-sphere cavities in dipolar fluids are plotted against the radius of the closest hard-sphere solute-solvent approach R 0s s ; σ s is the diameter of the solvent hard spheres. The dashed horizontal lines in the main panel and in the inset refer to the Lorentz result (L) of Eq. (2). The dash-dotted horizontal line in the inset refers to the Maxwell result (M) of Eq. (1). Both sets of lines have been produced with ε = 72.2 for SPC/E water at 300 K.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The solute-solvent distribution functions [Eq. (6)] vs the distance from the surface of the Kihara solute (R 0s = 13 Å). Shown are the solute-oxygen (solid lines) and solute-hydrogen (dotted lines) radial distribution functions (ℓ = 0) and orientational distributions for ℓ = 1 (dash-dotted lines) and ℓ = 2 (dashed lines); (a) refers to and (b) refers to .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The first (upper panel) and second (lower panel) orientational order parameters of the first-shell SPC/E waters vs . The solid circles (ε0s = 0.65 kJ/mol) and squares (ε0s = 20 kJ/mol) refer to Kihara solutes in water at T = 300 K. The corresponding open points refer to T = 273 K. The crosses in the lower panel show for HS cavities in the fluid of dipolar hard spheres (DHS) (Ref. 22). with the reduced dipole moment ; m is the dipole moment and σ s is the HS diameter of the solvent. The filled diamond labeled “plane” marks for a planar water interface from Ref. 9.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Distributions of three angles used to define the water orientations relative to the radial direction (Fig. 2): (a) θ b for the O–H bond (), (b) θ m for the water dipole (), and (c) θ for the normal to H2O plane (); R 0s = 13 Å.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Surface charge density σ P (θ) = P n (θ) vs the polar angle θ measured from the direction of the external field (a). The solid line (M) shows the result of Maxwell's electrostatics [Eq. (16), ε = 72.2 for SPC/E water at 300 K]. The dots refer to σ P calculated as a linear response to an external field from 40 ns of MD trajectories (see the SM (Ref. 19)). The MD σ P is collected from a water layer R 0s rR 0s + 0.1σ s for the solute with the size R 0s = 13 Å and ε0s = 0.65 kJ/mol. The dashed line shows the result of using E c from simulations to calculate χ1 from Eq. (13). Panel (b) shows the profile of water's dielectric constant (see text).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Relative dielectric constant increment Δε/ε, for several aqueous solutions: lysozyme (Ref. 29) (filled squares), dioxane (Ref. 30) (open circles), glucose (Ref. 31) (open diamonds), and maltotriose (Ref. 31) (open triangles). The solid line (M) shows the result of Eq. (18), while the dashed line (L) is the dielectric increment for a solute with no surface charge density, σ1 = 0, and therefore Lorentz result for the cavity field [Eq. (13)]. Experimental and calculation results used to convert the experimentally reported solute concentrations to volume fractions can be found in the SM (Ref. 19).


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Electric field inside a “Rossky cavity” in uniformly polarized water